Saturday, March 29, 2014

NEWS ARTICLE: HKTV will flout rules if even one person views content via antenna, watchdog tells Ricky Wong

I was reading the latest article from SCMP about the HKTV licensing issue....my first reaction to the 'new twist' mentioned in the article:  WOW....looks like the Communications Authority just put the nail in the coffin for HKTV -- they made it where now HKTV has no chance whatsoever to launch their station in HK, even if Ricky Wong agrees to use a lower transmission standard.  What a bunch of bastards (I'm referring to those boneheads in the Communications Authority / HK government)!

Looks like Ricky Wong is going to pursue legal action as his next step, but honestly, I don't think that will help much...with the HK government seemingly hell-bent on preventing him from launching his station, I highly doubt that any court in HK will rule in his favor.  Argh!!

*****
HKTV will flout rules if even one person views content via antenna, watchdog tells Ricky Wong

Source:  SCMP



The telecommunications watchdog and Ricky Wong Wai-kay of the Hong Kong Television Network sat down together yesterday for the first time since a mobile television row broke out - and ended up farther apart.

As the discussions reached a dead end, Wong sent an ultimatum to the Communications Authority (Ofca) threatening legal action in two weeks if no solution could be agreed on.

The three-hour session marked the first proper face-to-face negotiations between Wong and Ofca chairman Ambrose Ho Pui-him and director general of communications Eliza Lee Man-ching since January. Wong wanted to launch a mobile service after being denied a free-to-air television licence.

But in the end the meeting threw up more questions than solutions.

The HKTV chairman was told he would breach mobile television licensing rules if just one person watched the service at home using a public antenna.

Wong would need to obtain a broadcasting licence on top of a mobile licence, Ofca said.

Previously, the authority had objected to his proposal to use the digital terrestrial multimedia broadcast (DTMB) transmission standard - which is adopted by established stations TVB and ATV - as this would make HKTV a de facto free-television station.

It warned that if more than 5,000 households could view Wong's service via antenna, he would be bound by the Broadcasting Ordinance to obtain a free-to-air television licence.

But in the latest twist, the authority said the requirement would stand whether it was one person or 5,000.

A mobile television licensee can air shows for people on the go, but not offer "fixed services".

Ho said a fixed service meant any television service that could be picked up by a household antenna. "By providing a fixed service, HKTV would breach the licensing conditions of mobile television," he said.

Ofca advised HKTV to adopt a standard other than DTMB, such as those used for mobile television in Japan and Europe.

Wong called the requirement unreasonable, as it was impossible for a station to prevent viewers from plugging in receivers to public antennas.

"I've been working in the telecoms engineering field for more than 25 years. It is mission impossible," he said.

HKTV's application for a free-to-air television licence was rejected without a convincing explanation in October after a three-year wait. Wong pressed ahead with plans for a mobile service in December after acquiring China Mobile Hong Kong for HK$142 million along with its mobile television licence. His plan to launch in July came to a halt after Ofca disapproved of a change in transmission standard.

Thursday, March 27, 2014

NEWS ARTICLE: HKTV row -- Lawmakers poke at government vision on broadcasting laws

Here's yet another article on the HKTV mobile license fiasco.  I actually found this article kind of humorous in a way -- I mean, how funny is it watching our incompetent government leaders wasting their time arguing over petty things that shouldn't have even been an 'issue' in the first place?  (I know, I'm being facetious again, but can't help it....).

Honestly, this whole issue is freakin' ridiculous (pardon my language) -- during this critical time when the HK entertainment industry is already dying a slow and painful death (plus HK society as a whole is in chaos -- politically, socially, economically, etc.), all we need is for the imbecilic HK government to come along and push the industry (as well as society) over the edge.

Oh and seeing that we are living in the 21st century -- an era where technology is super advanced and 'gadgets' such as mobile devices are a common necessity rather than a luxury -- it's downright embarrassing to see that the mindsets of our government leaders seem to still be 'stuck' back in the 19th/20th centuries (limiting broadcasting to 5000 households?  outdated laws?  restricting transmission to less advanced methods?  viewers having to reach a deal with TV stations to watch free television???).  Geez, if I were a taxpaying TV entertainer in HK, I would be pissed that I'm paying such incompetent dogs to 'break' the TV industry and take my own 'rice bowl' away!

Ok, I should probably shut up now before I get myself in trouble....enough ranting from me for today!

*****

HKTV row: Lawmakers poke at government vision on broadcasting laws

Source:  SCMP



Does the government have its "eyes wide shut" over television broadcasting laws?
That was the question posed to Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So Kam-leung in a fiery Legislative Council debate yesterday as a lawmaker played on the title of late director Stanley Kubrick's last film.
Legislators suggested the government had erred in its assessment by not updating broadcasting laws when formulating policies for the development of mobile television.
So rejected the claims, saying the decision not to regulate on-the-go television services under the Broadcasting Ordinance was reached after a series of public consultations in 2007 and 2008.
"It was not a misjudgment," he told the Legco panel on information technology and broadcasting. "It was done with eyes open … There was a consensus [about not amending the law]."
He said the policy on mobile television adopted a technology-neutral principle. As long as the operator complied with legislation, it would not be restricted on the type of transmission to use.
Lawmakers disagreed, saying the latest rows revolving around Hong Kong Television Network stemmed from outdated laws.
"Eyes wide open? I would rather say Stanley Kubrick's movie title suits the government more - Eyes Wide Shut," Democratic Party chairwoman Emily Lau Wai-hing said.
Charles Mok, representing the information technology sector, said it was unreasonable to judge if tycoon Ricky Wong Wai-kay's HKTV had breached any laws by looking at how advanced televisions on the market were.
The Communications Authority has explained Wong is free to use any transmission standard as long as fewer than 5,000 households can watch HKTV on televisions at home.
Mok was shocked when So remarked: "Charles works in the IT industry. But it seems he does not understand technology well."
The authority's chairman, Ambrose Ho Pui-him, said they were not discriminating against HKTV. Although TVB and ATV signals could be picked up outdoors, the stations would be seen as running mobile services only if they invited viewers to reach an agreement with them, he said.
Wong said viewers would never need to reach a deal with stations to watch free television.

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

NEWS ARTICLE: HKTV may get worldwide audience – except Hong Kong

Here's the latest article on HKTV....based on the below, it looks like HKTV will move forward with selling their series to overseas buyers later this year.  This is definitely good news for those of us who live overseas, since it means that we will get to watch their series for sure.  Of course, this also means that Hong Kong audiences won't get to watch (in fact, they may never get to watch), since the HK government hates Ricky Wong with a passion and will do everything they can to push him out of HK.  I'm not trying to be mean or facetious, since, at the end of the day, I will always be a Hong Konger at heart....but honestly, this is one of those times where I'm SO GLAD that I don't live in HK (and it's not just because of the HKTV issue -- the tense political and social environment over there right now is more than I would be able to bear).

Anyway....glad to read some good news about HKTV (looks like there's hope in this world after all).  I'm sure there will be more to come about this in the coming months, so I'll definitely stay tuned!

*****
HKTV may get worldwide audience – except Hong Kong

Source:  SCMP

Article published March 26, 2014



Hong Kong Television Network shows could be available to TV viewers across the world – except Hong Kong – as early as this autumn.
Forced to postpone its launch date indefinitely, the station aims to close deals to sell its programmes to overseas buyers in the third quarter after further discussions at Filmart, the largest industry trade fair in Asia, now under way at the Convention and Exhibition Centre.
Shut out of the city’s free-to-air market by failure to get a licence and with questions hanging over its plan for a mobile service, HKTV is offering 15 drama series titles with 208 episodes and four variety shows with 68 episodes.
Chief executive To Wai-bing said there had been strong interest from international buyers and HKTV was in the final discussions for the sales. She said some buyers had offered to pay more than they did for TVB shows.
“We hope our shows can be released simultaneously around the region,” To said.
She said interest had come from traditional television stations as well as mainland web TV portals.
But since HKTV’s application for a free-to-air licence was rejected last October, and the mobile plan has been delayed because of the dispute over transmission standards, HKTV shows will be available to overseas viewers earlier than viewers in the station’s hometown.
“We hope Hong Kong can watch our shows too,” To said. “We don’t want Hong Kong to be left behind,”
HKTV obtained a mobile TV licence by acquiring China Mobile Hong Kong in December for HK$142 million. It chose to adopt a transmission standard shared with TVB and ATV but the communications watchdog warned it could breach the Broadcasting Ordinance if its signals could reach more than 5,000 homes via rooftop antennae without a free TV licence.
The station has invested more than HK$1 billion – including HK$1 million for each TV show episode – in the hope of launching a local service but none of the shows have been aired because of continuous disruption to the launch.
Industry sources said television content was in demand, particularly in mainland China where portals were willing to offer as much as 1 million yuan an episode for a drama show.
To said HKTV was considering uploading one epidsode of The Menu to the internet, an attempt to portray in a drama the current state of journalism and press freedom in Hong Kong. Featured plots include a media chief being attacked and media companies losing their freedom after being taken over by other companies.
She denied HKTV had any plans to acquire ATV or air its shows on the beleaguered station despite a surprise appearance by HKTV boss Ricky Wong Wai-kay on ATV’s talk show News Bar Talk two weeks ago.
ATV has denied it has engaged in any deals with HKTV.
Senior vice-president Ip Ka-po said ATV would undergo a major revamp in May with new programmes and would “welcome independent productions to occupy ATV’s air time”.
He said ATV would produce a 100-episode sitcom and TV movies. Shooting of a drama series would commence in September.
While rival TVB had a big booth occupying the centre of the exhibition hall with its A-list stars to front its programme promotions, ATV did not have a booth at Filmart this year. Ip explained that the station did not have many productions for sale but would return with a bigger presence next year.
Filmart this year has 770 exhibitors from 32 countries. It closes tomorrow.

Friday, March 14, 2014

News Articles: More updates on the HKTV mobile TV licensing issue

Here are some more articles that came out the last 2 days about HKTV.  

The article about Ricky Wong possibly taking over ATV is especially concerning, since we all know the dismal state that ATV is in currently -- plus there's always the possibility that they won't be able to get their license renewed come November 2015.  Even if it's true that RW will have to scrap his mobile television plans now, buying ATV isn't necessarily the better option since it's already obvious that the government is hardset on stopping him at all costs -- if RW were to buy ATV, I wouldn't be surprised if the government deliberately revokes ATV's license in 2015 just to push RW out.

In any case, let's see how this situation unfolds....

*******

Article 1 (published March 15, 2014):

HKTV boss Ricky Wong stirs takeover rumours with televised 'toast' to ATV

Source:  SCMP



Tycoon Ricky Wong Wai-kay raised a glass to former employer ATV last night as he made a shock appearance on the station - his first since his 12-day stint as its boss in 2008 - and set tongues wagging about his next move.

The Hong Kong Television Network boss, who this week put on hold plans for a mobile television channel, appeared on ATV's News Bar Talk for an unannounced interview with ATV news chief Lau Lan-cheong.

When Lau asked whether Wong had plans to buy or work with the troubled free-to-air broadcaster, Wong said: "This is not a question you should ask me. You'll have to ask your boss … what better point ATV should be brought to."

Lau pressed Wong, mentioning a meeting between him and controversial ATV investor Wong Ching in December. Ricky Wong smiled, raised a glass and said: "Let's toast."

Rumours linking Wong to a takeover of ATV or a deal to show HKTV programmes on its channels have swirled since the government denied HKTV a free-to-air licence in October. Wong then bought a mobile television licence and announced plans for a digital channel. But the Office of the Communications Authority told him he would need a free-to-air or pay-television licence if HKTV's broadcast signals could be shown on sets in more than 5,000 households.

He pilloried seemingly contradictory licensing requirements in his interview, saying: "As a matter of fact, how can there be fewer than 5,000 households ... receiving [mobile TV] when at the same time you have to ensure reception by half of the population, 3.6 million?"

ATV's future has also been the subject of speculation. Its licence is up for renewal next year and the station has frequently been in trouble with regulators, seen its audience share collapse and been accused of bias.

Meanwhile, HKTV last night announced to the stock exchange that there was no technical solution available that would allow it to run mobile television services in the long run.

In the announcement, made after markets closed, the company said it would continue its discussions with OFCA and take other appropriate measures, including court action and exploring online television opportunities. Its share price slid 3.32 per cent to HK$2.33 yesterday.

Wong met about 150 HKTV creative and production staff yesterday. He said it would take him a month to work out a new direction for the company. Sources said Wong told staff they could quit without penalty, but only when they had finished whatever project they were working on.

*****
Article 2 (published March 14, 2014):

HKTV's Ricky Wong fears technology 'trap' could land him in jail

Source:  SCMP


Hong Kong Television Network is bound to face legal uncertainties no matter what transmission standard it adopts - but that is a risk the operator should bear, the broadcasting and telecom watchdog said yesterday.

"Is this a trap?" responded HKTV chairman Ricky Wong Wai-kay, rebutting the contention of the Office of the Communications Authority (OFCA). "If I fall into this trap I will go to jail."

The exchange came as OFCA refused to give Wong an assurance his station would be able to stick to one transmission standard for 10 years without having to worry about breaking the law.

"We cannot predict what will happen in 10 years' time," deputy director-general of telecommunications Danny Lau Kwong-cheung said.

Wong, who has pledged to seek a judicial review of OFCA's requirement that he get a licence for his planned mobile television service if he uses his preferred format, said the legal battle would begin in one or two weeks if there was no progress.

OFCA earlier recommended that HKTV adopt the China Mobile Multimedia Broadcasting (CMMB) standard, suitable only for use on mobile phones, or the European DVB-H standard.

It rejected HKTV's proposal to use the Digital Terrestrial Multimedia Broadcasting (DTMB) standard - used by free stations TVB and ATV. When more than 5,000 households can receive HKTV's service via antennae on their buildings, the station would require a free-to-air or pay-television licence on top of the mobile television licence it bought last year, the watchdog said.

Wong turned to mobile TV after his application for a free-to-air licence was rejected last year.

If the DTMB standard was adopted, more than two million households with sets or set-top boxes that can decode DTMB would be able to watch HKTV. If HKTV chose the DVB-H standard, it would not need another TV licence for the time being, the authority said. That is because no sets on the market can decode such transmissions. But if sets able to decode DVB-H became popular the authority would have to act against HKTV, Lau said.

Wong said this left HKTV in jeopardy no matter what it did.

"Following OFCA's logic, no matter what transmission standard HKTV adopts, if our mobile TV service becomes a success and future TV sets install a receiver to receive HKTV's signal, HKTV will still breach the Broadcasting Ordinance."

Keith Li King-wah, a council member of the Hong Kong Wireless Technology Industry Association, said OFCA was being unreasonable in banning HKTV from using DTMB, China's national standard, and asking it to use the two other, outdated standards. "It's like the iPhone is available, but your dad only allows you to use a Nokia from 10 years ago," Li said. "Mobile TV is not subject to the Broadcasting Ordinance but the government keeps changing its stance to target Wong."

Wong said the government in the past had "followed the rules" and allowed him to develop his international telecommunications and internet businesses. But now OFCA was defying the rules by forcing him to get a free or pay-television licence to run the mobile service, he said.

*****

Article 3 (published March 14, 2014):
**Note that this is an opinion piece written by Stephen Vines for SCMP**

Government’s effort to thwart HKTV smacks of politics

Source:  SCMP



What is really going on over the government's seemingly remorseless attempts to prevent the public from getting access to Ricky Wong Wai-kay's Hong Kong Television Network (HKTV)?

Let's quickly deal with the latest move to thwart HKTV, in which the administration has insisted that the company needs to apply for a television licence if it is broadcasting to more than 5,000 households.

You can be pretty sure that the bureaucrats will be able to conjure up grounds for this stipulation.

Governments are good at finding legal reasons for politically motivated decisions. And there can no longer be a scintilla of doubt that the determination to thwart HKTV is not only political but most likely emanates from instructions issued up north.

Many people, including Wong himself, are puzzled over why this largely entertainment-based channel should have found itself in the eye of a political storm.

As ever, because of the closed-box way this government operates, it is hard to be sure of the reasons. But assumptions can be made.

The most likely explanation is that when the time came for television companies to apply for free-to-air licences, Hong Kong's masters insisted that they should be granted to the two established stations that had proved their loyalty. Additional licences were given to the son of Hong Kong's richest tycoon and to Cable TV, also controlled by Beijing loyalists.

It is unlikely that Wong was seen as some kind of dangerous opponent, but Beijing does not like to take chances with the unknown, especially in the crucial area of broadcasting - or propaganda, as broadcasting is viewed through the prism of the Chinese Communist Party's considerations.

The still unexplained decision to block HKTV's free-to-air licence application released an enormous surge of public anger, and Democrats were prominent among the protesters.

It seems probable that the decision-makers in Beijing saw this as vindication for their initial opposition to the network and thus the underlings in Hong Kong were ordered to tighten the screws on HKTV.

The Broadcasting Ordinance, which is clearly not fit for purpose in the digital age, provided a tool for precisely this purpose. However, its provisions are applied selectively and this brings the rule of law into disrepute.

Lamentably, it is no defence to argue that because others are breaching the letter of the law, a company accused of doing the same thing can be excused.

So HKTV clearly has a legal problem despite Wong's confidence that he can win a court case challenging the Communications Authority's decision. But the real issue is political, and this appears to have been acknowledged by most Hong Kong people, who clearly understand that government attempts to thwart new voices in the media are part of an attempt to impose wider controls on freedom of speech.

While all this is going on, we have seen the vicious attack on the former Ming Pao editor Kevin Lau Chun-to.
Suspects are now being rounded up in this case, but the police chief has already announced that while the motives for the attack remain unclear, he is confident that it had nothing to do with Lau's journalistic activities.

This is a breathtaking assertion, reflecting a worrying mentality.

Meanwhile, some companies have been accused of mounting an advertising boycott campaign to try to undermine the commercial viability of critical media.

What we are seeing is a slowly unfolding attack on Hong Kong's way of life, aided by a government that claims to understand the importance of a free media while, in reality, it is leading the charge to ensure that the media is curbed.

Stephen Vines is a Hong Kong-based journalist and entrepreneur

*****
Article 4 (published March 14, 2014):

Internet TV may not be enough for Ricky Wong Wai-kay, say experts

Source:  SCMP



Internet television may be the future for both Ricky Wong Wai-kay and Hong Kong's TV industry, but difficulties in translating its impact into advertising dollars mean it is not yet a viable business, industry players say.

While the entrepreneur made his first fortune from telecom and broadband internet businesses, he still needs a television service with wide penetration that can generate impact and advertising revenue, they say.

Keith Li King-wah, a council member of the Hong Kong Wireless Technology Industry Association, said the success of Netflix, an on-demand video-streaming service founded in the US, and mainland internet television services such as Sohu TV and LeTV, showed the medium's potential.

Other internet television viewing equipment, such as Apple TV and the Xiaomi set-top box, are also growing in popularity. An authorised local seller of the Xiaomi box has sold more than 10,000 in a month.

"Even those who watch TVB dramas watch them on myTV instead of the television set," Li said, referring to TVB's internet service that is also available as a smartphone app.

Li said he believed Wong, an expert in the telecom and internet business, should have incorporated all the developments in internet television into his Hong Kong Television Network (HKTV).

"But in reality, he needs a service that can penetrate households to create an impact. Those who watch [terrestrial] TV don't use the internet, and internet users don't watch [terrestrial] TV. But you need those housewives to watch the programmes and talk about it to build the momentum," he said.

"Even if you have internet TV, Borderline can never be Triumph in the Skies II."

Borderline is HKTV's crime thriller and its first episode accumulated more than 1.3 million views over the past eight months. But TVB's Triumph in the Skies II, set against the backdrop of a commercial airline, was the talk of the town last year. It recorded an average of more than two million viewers when the show was aired.

Recouping advertising dollars is the issue. Ray Wong, a member of the Association of Accredited Advertising Agencies' media committee and head of media agency PHD, said on average terrestrial television accounted for about 60 per cent of the budget of an advertising campaign.

"But only 15 to 20 per cent would be allocated to digital spending, and internet TV will account only for a thin slice of that pie," Wong said.

He said there was no mechanism to translate internet impact into advertising dollars. He said the recent overwhelming popularity of Korean romance My Love from the Star on the internet did not bring any advertising dollars to the online platforms.

"We hope there will be more platforms available so that we have more choices to place ads," he said. "Our existing ad rates research methods are already at their best. Advertisers want to spend money only on a medium that has a track record. But internet TV doesn't have a track record yet."

Next Media, which publishes Apple Daily newspaper and its online video Action News, might offer some clues, Li said.

The company's annual report last year said the Apple Daily mobile app topped the iTunes and Android download platforms and its internet business recorded HK$157.2 million revenue last year - a 233.1 per cent increase from the previous year.

But the segment also recorded a loss of HK$124.5 million.

"Apple Daily Action News is already the most popular but its books do not reflect that," Li said.

He said no matter what, Ricky Wong would need a terrestrial service or mobile service with high penetration. "It's like the print media and online media. You read the news online but you still need the hard copy of a newspaper to maintain the impact."

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

News Articles: Updates on latest HKTV mobile TV issue

Since the news about HKTV's latest mobile TV issue broke yesterday, there have been alot of follow up reports in subsequent days.  The issue is actually more complicated than imagined because now it turns out that the laws aren't clear and there's no way to prove either side is right or wrong.  

The issue is definitely confusing, as the Communications Authority held a press conference to 'refute' Ricky Wong's claims and not long after that, Ricky Wong held yet another press conference responding to the CA's accusations.  It's getting to the point of 'ridiculous' now...

Anyway, below are a few articles that might help to clarify the issue...I'm sure there will be further developments on this in the coming days, so stay tuned!

*****
Article 1 (published March 13, 2014):

Ricky Wong's plans for mobile TV hangs on legal grey area

Source:  SCMP


Laws that govern traditional and new media by different standards leave Ricky Wong Wai-kay's plan for a court challenge to the government's rejection of his mobile television service hanging in the balance, legal experts say.

The laws contain "grey areas" and are outdated, they say.

At issue is Wong's plan to use a higher-quality format known as DTMB for his Hong Kong Television Network service instead of the lower-definition CMMB used by China Mobile from whom Wong acquired the licence.

The Communications Authority said this would in effect allow Wong's mobile broadcast to be viewable by households using traditional television sets.

This is because TVB and ATV, the two free-to-air broadcasters, are also using DTMB.

A key question is whether mobile television is covered by the Broadcasting Ordinance or the Telecommunications Ordinance. The government's view is that a service falls under the latter if it can reach more than 5,000 households.

The authority said Wong - who planned the service after being denied a new free-to-air licence - would need a licence for either a free or paid service.

Wong said on Tuesday he would seek a judicial review.

Information Technology Federation honorary president Francis Fong Po-kiu said yesterday it was unclear who would win because the issue - whether DTMB could be applied to mobile television without further restrictions - had no precedent.

Institution of Engineer member Henry Cheung Nin-sang, said it was wrong for the government to equate the mode with viewing quality as a number of factors could affect the final quality.

The authority also drew ire for apparently infringing the government's "technology-neutral" principle by referring to a particular technical mode.

"The authority's explanation has per se deviated from the technology-neutral principle," information-technology sector lawmaker Charles Mok said. "It failed to explain which aspect of the DTMB technology, or its usage, was in conflict with the policy concerning mobile TV."

Professor Anthony Fung Ying-him, director of journalism and communications at the Chinese University, said the authority's stance on the HKTV row "violates in all respects" the neutrality principle.

"Only mobile TV is being targeted now, but the restriction is not equally applied to internet and broadband television services," he said.

Wong said his understanding was that as long as the receiving tool - like a USB device or anything movable rather than fixed - was mobile, the service was classified as mobile television.



Strengths and weaknesses

Ricky Wong Wai-kay's proposal to use Digital Terrestrial Multimedia Broadcasting (DTMB) for HKTV's mobile television service was rejected by the Communications Authority. It proposed China Mobile Multimedia Broadcasting (CMMB) or Digital Video Broadcasting-Handheld (DVB-H).

Here is an explanation of the differences provided by the watchdog:


DTMB

Usage: Terrestrial and mobile television

Resolution: Up to high definition 1080i

Watching programmes: Up to two million households can watch digital television by tuning in without having to buy new receivers. Alternatively, they can watch the programmes on their mobile phones connected to receivers

Strength and weakness: High video quality at fixed locations, low mobility - services prone to interruptions during commutate



CMMB

Usage: Mobile television

Resolution: Low definition of 320i

Watching programmes: On mobile phones, some of which may have to be connected to receivers.

Strength and weakness: High mobility, low quality



DVB-H

Usage: Mobile televisions

Resolution: Up to 1080i

Watching programmes: On mobile phones or televisions, some of which may have to be connected to receivers

Strength and weakness: High video quality, but users must buy new receivers




Timeline

How the government has defined mobile television services under the law over the past few years:

February 2007 The then Broadcasting Authority (now Office of the Communications Authority) decides that mobile television services need not be licensed under the Broadcasting Ordinance when it rules that an appeal of a complaint against four 3G mobile-service operators for offering the services without licences was unjustified

December 2008 The Commerce and Economic Development Bureau suggests separating licensing regimes for regulating "conveyance" and "content" of mobile television services, and for the services to require a unified carrier licence issued under the Telecommunications Ordinance

February 2010 The government announces that licensing arrangements for broadcast-type mobile television services will come under the Telecommunications Ordinance. Service operators have to offer coverage for 50 per cent of the population within 18 months of the licence being granted. The government says it will adopt a market-led, technology-neutral approach, allowing the market to select technical standards for such services

February 2010 The then Office of the Telecommunications Authority (now Office of the Communications Authority) states in the information memorandum for the auction of radio spectrum for the provision of broadcast-type mobile television services that the licensee will be free to adopt any widely recognised standard for the services

June 2010 China Mobile Hong Kong wins the bid for the 15-year unified carrier licence of the radio spectrum for mobile television services with its CMMB standard at the cost of HK$175 million

December 2013 HKTV announces its HK$142 million acquisition of China Mobile Hong Kong's unified carrier licence, which will allow it to offer mobile television services. HKTV announces it will launch its internet television services from July 2014

January 2014 HKTV informs telecommunications watchdog Ofca that it will upgrade the CMMB standard to DTMB

January 2014 Ofca says it has reminded HKTV that its upgrade plan may violate the Broadcasting Ordinance

March 2014 HKTV receives Ofca's legal letter saying that it has to have a free-to-air or pay-TV licence if its mobile television service is made available to more than 5,000 households

March 2014 HKTV halts its plans to launch its mobile television services in July and suspends the shooting of all new television programmes

****
Article 2 (published March 12, 2014):

Ricky Wong warned two months ago about plans to upgrade mobile TV service

Source:  SCMP


The government hit back yesterday at Ricky Wong Wai-kay's allegations that was it deliberately blocking him from launching his television business.

It said Wong's current plan for his HKTV mobile television service would breach the law without a licence.

Free-to-air leader TVB also stepped into the row, accusing Wong of reinventing HKTV as "de facto domestic free TV without a licence" by upgrading its broadcasting standards.

Wong, who was told on Tuesday that he must not launch a mobile TV service if he did not change his plan, denied his service was free TV in disguise.

Eliza Lee Man-ching, director-general of communications in the Office of the Communications Authority, said the office contacted HKTV in January after learning of its intention to upgrade its transmission standard from China Mobile Multimedia Broadcasting (CMMB ) to the much finer Digital Terrestrial Multimedia Broadcasting (DTMB). On January 24, it gave a "friendly reminder" the change might make the station liable to the Broadcasting Ordinance.

"If HKTV adopted the DTMB standard, more than two million households would be able to watch its programmes on TV at home," deputy director-general of telecommunications Danny Lau Kwong-cheung said.

The number would exceed 5,000 households, a threshold which triggers the licensing requirement. No external receiver was needed to watch DTMB transmissions, he added.

TVB said it used DTMB, which covered 99 per cent of the population, as the transmission standard for its five digital terrestrial television channels.

HKTV's plan to use the same standard and become a "de facto" free service was the reason it terminated Wong's lease of TVB's hilltop transmission sites.

"We may also be legally liable if the unlawful broadcast is transmitted from our hilltop sites," a spokesman said.

Government sources said the Broadcasting Ordinance and Telecommunications Ordinance - attacked by legal experts for being outdated and leaving "grey areas" - would be reviewed.

The sources refused to comment on whether the government had assessed the extent of public anger over its denial of a new free-to-air licence to Wong, after which he launched his plan for a mobile service.

"We regret that this has interrupted [Wong's] plan, but we did not target Wong or anyone," one senior government source said. "We too want him to succeed. But there is a legal issue here."

HKTV chairman Wong had hoped to make a comeback with a mobile service through the HK$142 million acquisition of mobile TV licensee China Mobile Hong Kong Corporation.

The authority suggested HKTV adopt another transmission standard, but Wong questioned whether he would fall into a legal trap if future TV sets were upgraded to receive other signals without any external devices.

Legislative Council president Jasper Tsang Yok-sing said the government owed the public an explanation for blocking HKTV.

HKTV shares, suspended on Tuesday, resumed trading yesterday. Prices fell by 22 per cent.

****
Article 3 (published March 12, 2014):

Move for license law review may be on way

Source:  The Standard

Lawmaker Paul Tse Wai-chun, who was the first to draw attention to the 5,000 household limit, says he may raise a motion in the Legislative Council for a review of the Broadcasting Ordinance before the next issue of TV licenses.

But Tse said as it stands, the law does apply to HKTV's intention to provide TV services for households.

It is the second time Tse has been involved in an HKTV controversy, the first being in November last year when he changed his position from supporting the powers and privileges motion to probe the government's decision on free TV licenses to abstaining when the vote was taken.

Tse raised the question whether HKTV would breach the Broadcasting Ordinance during a Legislative Council panel meeting on Monday.

He said the ordinance made it clear that any television program service which is intended or available for reception by an audience of more than 5,000 specified premises should obtain a free-to-air television license.

"The main point is `intended or available for reception.' The subsidiary of China Mobile's service aimed at those who used portable digital services and not home television," Tse said.

"HKTV made it clear it was its intention to `go into your home,"' he said.

When asked whether the ordinance was outdated, Tse said he may raise a motion in the Legco to review the ordinance which can be applied in the next free license renewal.

"It would be good if there are more choices of TV for the public. HKTV can study any cooperation opportunities with the other two free TV stations," he said.

The other two stations are TVB and ATV, whose licenses expire in 2015.

Public consultation is ongoing for the license renewal of both existing free TV stations.

In Monday's panel meeting, director-general of communications Eliza Lee Man-ching told Tse that HKTV was reminded that it had to obtain a free TV license if there are more than 5,000 reception points.

Anthony Fung Ying-him, dean of the School of Journalism and Communication of Chinese University, said it was inappropriate to apply the Broadcasting Ordinance that regulates television to restrict a mobile TV service.

****
Article 4 (published March 12, 2014):

HKTV boss faces roadblock over plans for mobile TV

Source:  SCMP



Failure to integrate broadcasting and telecommunications laws in line with technological advances has further obstructed efforts by HKTV chairman Ricky Wong Wai-kay to launch his television service, critics say.

Wong, denied a free-to-air licence last year while two other applicants were approved, had planned to launch a mobile service through his recently acquired China Mobile Hong Kong.

But the Office of the Communications Authority has demanded he apply for a free-to-air or pay-TV licence if he can't guarantee his mobile service will reach fewer than 5,000 households.

Wong said mobile TV had not been subject to the Broadcasting Ordinance in the past.

While he refused to speculate on whether there were political reasons behind the action, he said he could not understand the rationale behind the change.

He said he had obtained the mobile TV licence through the acquisition of China Mobile Hong Kong last year. "They were able to cover 90 per cent [of the city's population]. Why weren't they required to apply for a free-to-air or pay-TV licence?"

HKTV has obtained a unified carrier licence, a form of telecommunications licence, for its programmes. Its content is subject to regulation by general laws but not the Broadcasting Ordinance.

Similarly, the acquisition of the mobile TV licence from China Mobile's Hong Kong unit was subject to the Telecommunications Ordinance merger and acquisition rules, not those of the Broadcasting Ordinance.

The OCA said last night that it had made the requirement because different transmission standards had been adopted. It said mobile TV operators could only offer coverage at moving locations, not households.

Information-technology lawmaker Charles Mok said the reason the government had suddenly decided to invoke the Broadcasting Ordinance was Wong's plan to use set-top boxes to allow households to watch mobile TV programmes at home.

"Under existing regulations, it wouldn't be a problem to plug receivers into mobile phones or transmit the programmes through the internet. That's why China Mobile didn't come across any problems in the past," Mok said. "But what Wong now proposes is something China Mobile didn't do before - to plug receivers into TV sets directly."

Anthony Fung Ying-him, the head of Chinese University's journalism and communication school, said: "Around the world, governments are working to encourage the convergence of different media … On the mainland, telecom signals would turn into TV signals when a user with a mobile phone walks towards a TV.

"They are not using a law, but a very technical requirement - of 5,000 specified premises - to put a stop to Wong's plan."

The government has agreed in principle to grant free-to-air licences to Cable TV and Now TV, with the details to be negotiated.

"By treating Wong differently, the government is giving a very bad impression," Fung said. "It has turned Hong Kong into a city of unfair competition."

Lawmaker Claudia Mo said: "HKTV has had that licence for months, but the authorities didn't give it any warning about possible breaches. It just seems like the government is trying to find anything to ruin HKTV."


RICKY WONG’S TELEVISION SCHEDULE

JANUARY 2003
Then City Telecom (CTI) chairman Ricky Wong Wai-kay prepares to launch internet-based pay-TV services under CTI's internet business unit - Hong Kong Broadband Network - after the government says there is no need for a broadcasting licence because the company's pay-TV service is based on an open internet platform

DECEMBER 2008
Wong is named ATV chief executive officer; he steps down after just 12 days

DECEMBER 2009
CTI applies for a free-to-air television licence

AUGUST 2011
CTI invests HK$600 million in a plan to build a television and multimedia production centre in Tseung Kwan O

APRIL 2012
CTI, focused on entering the free-to-air television market, agrees to sell its telecommunications assets for HK$5.01 billion to a company backed by British buyout firm CVC Capital Partners

DECEMBER 2012
CTI changes its name to Hong Kong Television Network, and its new station is named HKTV

OCTOBER 2013
HKTV loses its bid for a free-to-air licence, sparking a public outcry. Wong announces a plan to axe 320 HKTV employees.

DECEMBER 2013
Wong says HKTV will press ahead with its broadcasting plans by launching internet television services from July 2014, and promises to rehire those he retrenched. He unveils his plan after the company's HK$142 million acquisition of China Mobile Hong Kong, a subsidiary of state-owned China Mobile, which has a unified carrier licence that allows it to offer mobile television services through its broadcast spectrum

JANUARY 2014
China Mobile investigates the HK$142 million deal, saying it might have violated mainland rules. Wong applies for a judicial review against the government's rejection of his free-to-air licence application. Existing free-to-air broadcaster TVB announces a plan to end the lease of six transmission stations to China Mobile Hong Kong by July 6, putting HKTV's internet television plans in jeopardy.

MARCH 2014
HKTV says it will halt plans to launch its digital television services in July and suspend the filming of all new television programmes

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

BREAKING NEWS: HKTV postpones mobile TV launch after ‘unfavourable’ response from Ofca

All I want to say is WTF????

It's quite saddening and discouraging to hear this news. I don't know about you, but it's obvious to me that the HK government is "out to get" Ricky Wong....

Other than that, I'm utterly speechless right now....

****

HKTV postpones mobile TV launch after ‘unfavourable’ response from Ofca

Source:  SCMP


Hong Kong Television Network (HKTV) has postponed the launch of its mobile television service for an unspecified period and suspended filming of new programmes after it was told that its proposals did not satisfy legal requirements.
In a statement, HKTV said it received “an unfavourable reply” from the Office of the Communications Authority (Ofca) on Tuesday afternoon regarding the service’s transmission standards and its compliance with the Broadcasting Ordinance.
“Ofca is of the view that the company’s proposed transmissions standard would render its mobile television service immediately available for reception by an audience of more than 5,000 specified premises in Hong Kong,” the company said in the statement.The company had been in discussion with the broadcasting watchdog over legal and technical aspects of its mobile television plan, particularly its transmission standards and its use of rooftop sites. The company had originally scheduled to launch the new service on July 1.
HKTV said it had been told by the broadcasting watchdog that it had to get a domestic free-to-view or pay-TV licence first before launching a mobile TV service.
“Thereby [it requires] the company to obtain a domestic free television programme service licence and/or a domestic pay television programme service licence before the commencement of its mobile television operations,” it said.
In light of this latest development, HKTV said it now expected that the launch date of its over-the-top (OTT) and mobile television services would be postponed. It did not specify the expected length of the postponement.
At a press conference on Tuesday afternoon, HKTV chairman Ricky Wong Wai-kay said the authority’s latest decision was absurd and “extremely rude”.
“HKTV is forced into a dead end,” he said. “I don’t know when, or whether, HKTV can really launch its television service,” he said.
The government rejected HKTV’s bid for a free-to-air TV licence last October when it awarded a licence to each of two other competing companies. This sparked a week-long protest with tens of thousands rallying outside the government headquarters in Tamar.

Monday, March 10, 2014

News Articles: Update on Free TV Licensing Issues

Long time no see!  

First off, my apologies for the lack of posts and updates in recent weeks.  I've had a lot going on the past month or so and unfortunately, due to time constraints, this blog became lower priority for me.  With that said though, I'm officially 'back' now, working on posts and trying to get back into the swing of things. Sincere THANK YOU to the readers of my blog for your continued dedication and patience! :-)

Ok, so now on to the main post...

As I've been 'catching up' on HK entertainment stuff, I came across a few articles from this past week that give a little bit of an update on some matters related to the free TV licensing issue.  Now, you might be wondering -- what TV licensing issue?  Isn't that over already with the issuance of new licenses to NowTV and i-Cable and the 'infamously controversial' snubbing of HKTV last year?  Well, yes and no.  

The licensing controversy involving HKTV, NowTV, and i-Cable may be over -- for now -- but there's been another licensing issue going on simultaneously (actually since a few years ago, even before the licensing decision came out last year).  I'm sure those who had been following the licensing issue avidly will remember that both of HK's current free TV stations -- TVB and ATV -- are up for license renewal in November 2015.  As part of the renewal process, both TV stations are supposed to participate in 'public consultation' sessions hosted by the Communications Authority (formerly the Broadcasting Authority) whereby ordinary HK citizens (aka 'the public') get to voice their opinions -- good or bad -- about both stations.  During the sessions, representatives from both stations as well as from the CA sit at a long table and listen to the public speak -- of course, both stations are allowed to give their 'concluding statements' at the end where they can refute some of the public's arguments if they want, but for the most part, they are sitting there taking notes.  

I've been watching news coverage of the public consultation sessions (there have been 3 of them in the past 2 weeks) and let me tell you, it's quite interesting to watch -- some of the audience members actually make very good, valid points while others say things that don't make an ounce of sense whatsoever.  The 'highlight' for me though is watching how the management at both TVB and ATV respond to the 'feedback' that they are being given face-to-face -- both stations got 'clobbered' with tons of criticisms but ATV got hit especially hard (TVB at least got some praises for some of their programming...ATV got mostly criticism...in fact, it started to feel like a 'bash ATV' session after awhile).

Anyway, since I haven't posted in awhile, I decided to include a few articles related to the public consultation session as well as 2 related articles about some 'aftermath' from last year's controversial licensing decision and also the latest 'firing' of yet another ATV senior executive.  All are interesting reads and provide pretty good updates on some of the things going on outside of the standard celebrity news articles.

Enjoy!! :-)

*****

Article 1 (published March 11, 2014):

Watchdog urged to be transparent over ATV and TVB licence renewal

Source:  SCMP


Lawmakers have criticised as "opaque" and "unclear" the yardsticks set by the broadcasting watchdog for the renewal of ATV and TVB's broadcasting licences next year.

Members of the Legislative Council's panel on broadcasting urged the Communications Authority to instead set clear criteria - and to recommend the government refuse a new licence if either of the free-to-air stations fails to make the grade.

Both stations have attracted controversy. TVB has been accused of taking advantage of its dominant position in the market, while cash-strapped ATV has frequently fallen foul of the watchdog - often due to allegations of interference by its mainland investor, Wong Ching. Both - but especially ATV - have faced complaints of pro-Beijing bias.

The authority was seeking lawmakers' views on the licence renewal process, which is also subject to a two-month public consultation, ending on April 3.

Its chairman, Ambrose Ho Pui-him, told the panel it would take into account the track records of the licence holders, their financial strength and public opinion before making a recommendation to the chief executive.

"We shall assess the three factors individually and then come up with an overall assessment," Ho said.

But People Power lawmaker Raymond Chan Chi-chuen, once an ATV presenter, said: "An overall assessment can be very subjective. We need a more transparent system."

League of Social Democrats chairman "Long Hair" Leung Kwok-hung said the watchdog should set clear criteria and make them public, so citizens could monitor its work.

"I daresay all the people of Hong Kong want ATV to fold," Leung said. "I wonder why the authority would still need to consider giving it a licence."

Others referenced the row over the last round of free-to-air television licensing decisions last year, when the government went against the watchdog's recommendation and gave new licences to only two of the three bidders: existing pay television players Now TV and Cable TV. The decision sparked huge protests.

Labour's Cyd Ho Sau-lan asked whether the station that missed out, Hong Kong Television Network, would automatically get a licence if ATV or TVB were rejected.

Ambrose Ho declined to speculate. He said the watchdog would make a recommendation on whether to renew the licences around November, but the final decision would be for Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying.

The authority held the last of three hearings on the renewal process in Sha Tin last night. As at previous hearings most of those who spoke criticised ATV's programming. Ho promised to consider the views raised.

The Legco panel will hold a special meeting on Saturday to listen to the views of concerned groups on licensing renewal.

Yesterday's panel meeting also endorsed a request from RTHK to retain the position of deputy director of broadcasting for the next five years to help the government-owned station prepare for its move to a new headquarters. The headquarters plan has been delayed by at least two years after another Legco panel rejected a funding request following a huge rise in costs.

Panel members also approved a HK$64.2 million plan to allow RTHK to extend the reach of its digital terrestrial television stations to 99 per cent of homes.

****
Article 2 (published February 17, 2014):

Second blowup set in license row

Source:  The Standard


A new drama will unfold this evening when a public hearing on TVB and ATV is held.

It's part of the public consultation process on their licenses that are due for renewal in 2015. Three sessions are scheduled - after tonight's on Hong Kong Island, the others will be held later in Kowloon and the New Territories.

Although the hearings are hosted by the Communications Authority, senior executives from both TV stations will attend. Will they be chastised by radicals, like what happened during the mid-term review in 2009, when then TVB general manager Stephen Chan Chi-wan was dogged by opponents whenever he appeared in public?

As the host, the authority is duty- bound to ensure the public can air their views properly. It's obvious the regulator has learned from past experience and isn't taking any chances in the face of the intense interest everyone has in TV.

At least, it has set the ground rules prohibiting anyone from carrying protesting banners and placards into the City Hall Concert Hall - amid fears they would disrupt the hearing.

Its staff have made it clear to protesters they will be expelled if they cause a ruckus. For example, well- known activist Lui Yuk-lin has been warned.

The hearing won't be a question and answer forum, but it'd be unrealistic to expect opponents to stop playing tricks.

TV licensing has always been a sensitive issue. But what happens next may differ from what transpired five years ago. At that time, protesters went after TVB, while ATV was basically the supporting character.

Their roles will likely be reversed, as recent commentaries in local newspapers were more critical of ATV than TVB.

The so-called "Wong Ching Incident" - in which ATV executive director James Shing Pan-yu was forced to quit the station - has dealt ATV a huge blow. That's unprecedented in local television history.

Public opinions are rather one-sided: ATV doesn't deserve a license in view of its dismal performance. It will bear most of the heat.

Of course, TVB has its own share of detractors, but the most controversial issue - the row over the government's rejection of a free-to-air license for HKTV - had nothing to do with TVB.

While it's inevitable for the debate to spill over to the shattering of HKTV boss Ricky Wong Wai-kay's dream, TVB is safe, as its dominant position in the industry makes it too big for a rejection to be viable.
But it's clear TVB isn't taking any chances, as a recent minor incident revealed.

While the public heard about how speedskater Barton Lui Pan-to complained of being left in the cold by the SAR's Olympics officials during the Sochi Winter Games, a local daily reported that the image of the "Snow Lion Flag" - a symbol of the Tibetan independence movement - appeared in TVB's coverage of the sports event.

The image turned out to be fake, doctored by netizens. TVB immediately raised the matter with the newspaper and demanded a clarification - putting out a potential fire.

If the license review is a test for both stations, it's also a test of the authority's skills to conduct it fairly and peacefully.

********
Article 3 (published March 11, 2014):

Terms set on renewal of licenses for TV stations

Source:  The Standard

The Communications Authority will consider TVB's and ATV's financial viability and operation capabilities when handling their renewal bids for free-to-air TV licenses, its chairman said.

Ambrose Ho Pui-him also told the Legislative Council's panel on information technology and broadcasting that the authority will consider public opinions when handling the applications of the two stations.

The broadcasters' licenses will expire next year.

People Power lawmaker Raymond Chan Chi-chuen asked about the criteria for renewal.

"We will base it on the operation and financial capabilities as well as their TV programming arrangements," Ho said, adding that the authority will seek public opinions.

"We will also take into account their performance, implementing their license terms, legal requirements and code of practice in the past," Ho said yesterday.

The authority will also take into account any violation of regulations.

The authority will then make their recommendation to Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying in November, before the Chief Executive in Council makes the final decision.

The panel also passed a non- binding motion by Civic Party lawmaker Claudia Mo Man-ching demanding the government take into account whether the two broadcasters had shown professional integrity before renewing their licenses.

In a related development, the authority held the third public hearing in Sha Tin Town Hall on the license renewals last night.

Outside the venue, a group of ATV supporters staged a rally to demand the authority renew its license.

Others urged the government not to renew the license as its programs mostly lack quality.


*********
Article 4 (published March 11, 2014):

Consultant in TV row to sue old firm for HK$10m

Source:  SCMP



A consultant who alleges she was asked to resign after speaking out against the government in last year's television licensing row says she will sue her former company for more than HK$10 million she says she is owed.

Jenny Ng Pui-ying, former managing partner at Value Partners, said that after the company announced she had resigned "voluntarily" it had issued a dismissal letter to avoid paying out money due to her.

In an interview with the Economic Journal, she accused the consulting firm - engaged by the government to report on the issuing of new free-to-air television licences - of "tackling" her with "an unusual action".

She told the Chinese-language newspaper that she decided to resign and her resignation was accepted before reports emerged she had been pressed to quit after the company's Italian founder, Giorgio Rossi Cairo, received a complaint accusing her of breaching confidentiality.

The complaint came after Ng came out in December to say that the government had used a report from her consultancy as a shield against criticism of its decision not to grant a free-to-air television licence to Hong Kong Television Network. She said it had quoted "a few paragraphs" from a 400-page report "out of context" in seeking to justify the awarding of licences only to applicants backed by pay-television players Now TV and Cable TV.

Value Partners said on February 5 that Ng had quit "voluntarily" in a letter dated January 22.

After her departure, she said, the company issued a letter of dismissal because, she claimed, it did not want to compensate her for lack of notice or compensate her for leave owing.

She was quoted as saying she believed "someone had stirred up the matter" but she had no evidence to point to the government. Ng reiterated in the interview that she did not regret speaking out against the government, but what upset her most was that her contribution to the company had been wiped out.

In an invitation to a press conference this afternoon, Ng wrote that Value Partners "had unreasonably withheld her salary and bonus of more than HK$10 million" and "her personal e-mail account was hacked".

Ng could not be reached for comment last night. Value Partners had not responded to questions about Ng's accusations.

********

Article 5 (published February 27, 2014):

ATV drama continues as chief lodges complaint

Source:  SCMP


ATV is embroiled in controversy again. Its boss has filed a complaint with the broadcasting watchdog, accusing the station's high-profile investor Wong Ching of meddling in its affairs.

In a letter addressed to Communications Authority chairman Ambrose Ho Pui-him and other members of the watchdog, ATV executive director Louie King-bun wrote that Wong had on multiple occasions interfered in the station's operations.

"As ATV's executive director, I must report Wong's multiple interference in ATV's operations," Louie wrote in the letter, dated yesterday, a copy of which has been obtained by the South China Morning Post.

The television station was last year fined HK$1 million and its former chief James Shing Pan-yu ordered to step down after the authority found that Shing had allowed Wong, who is not a member of ATV's board of directors, to interfere in its operations.

Louie wrote that, against his wishes, Wong had been instructing him to disregard contractual rules in the handling of business affairs. Wong later asked Nicholas Li, a vice-president who handles financial affairs, to carry out his instructions, Louie added.

"But Li's act was against the company's principles," Louie wrote, without elaborating. "I terminated his employment, but [ATV's largest stakeholder] Wong Ben-koon and Wong Ching asked me to give him another chance … [so] I reinstated Li."

According to Louie, Wong Ching sent him a text message on Tuesday afternoon, listing "three crimes" the station chief had committed. That same day, Wong Ben-koon met Louie in Shenzhen and said Louie had to leave ATV because he had not complied with Wong's orders.

At midnight yesterday, Dragon Viceroy, an ATV stakeholder controlled by Wong Ben-koon, issued a statement that Louie was no longer on the station's board of directors. "This is why I must report this. I am still the head of ATV's management as of now," Louie wrote.

The watchdog yesterday confirmed receipt of a complaint regarding control over the station's operations. It declined to name the complainant, but said it would follow up on the matter. Last night, Louie could not be reached for comment and ATV did not respond to inquiries.

Last August, Louie, former executive editor of leftist newspaper Ta Kung Pao, replaced Shing after the authority ruled the latter breached licensing terms by letting Wong interfere with ATV's day-to-day operations.

The authority began its investigation in July 2011 after allegations that Wong gave instructions on a newscast falsely reporting the death of former Chinese president Jiang Zemin .

Saturday, March 8, 2014

Review of TVB series “Rage and Passion 中神通王重陽” (1992)

Cast (partial list):  Ekin Cheng (鄭伊健), Fiona Leung (梁藝), Gallen Lo (羅嘉良), Money Lo (盧敏儀), Wayne Lai (黎耀祥), Newton Lai (黎漢持), Mary Hon (韓馬利), Lee Sing Cheong (李成昌),  Lam Seung Mo (林尚武), Cheung Yik (張翼), etc. with guest appearances by Eddie Kwan (關禮傑) and Vivian Chow (周慧敏)


First off, I would like to make one very important ‘disclaimer’ of sorts – I’m sure that fans of Jin Yong’s novels will be able to recognize the Chinese title of the series instantly and mistakenly think that this is another one of those ‘remakes’ of JY’s works.  To clarify – this series is NOT a remake of Jin Yong’s novels, but rather a fictional ‘prequel’ (or ‘spinoff’) based on a few of the characters from his famous Return of the Condor Heroes story.  Though some of the names are the same and even such details as personality traits and relationships are quite similar to the Jin Yong version of the story that most of us are familiar with, it’s important to note that these ‘details’ were added for effect and enhancement purposes.  Back in the early 90s (1991 to about 1993 or so), TVB actually produced a number of these Jin Yong ‘prequel’ series that technically have nothing to do with the novels and merely ‘borrow’ some details to make their own story.

I put such emphasis on the above point because it truly does affect the way one watches this series.  Fans of Jin Yong’s novels might get ticked off when they watch this series because it ‘distorts’ the original story so much (the ending especially will probably leave fans of the original story scratching their heads) – which is why I wouldn’t recommend watching this series if you’re a Jin Yong ‘purist’ unless you are able to remove the ‘Jin Yong’ element and treat this series as purely a fictional, stand-alone story.  Otherwise, you will definitely have a hard time getting through this series (and the other ‘prequels’ from that era) without wanting to pull your hair out in frustration.

Ok, now that I got that out of the way, a quick explanation on why I chose to watch this series (especially seeing how much I dislike watching shows that are not loyal to the original works on which they are based):   the primary reason is because I like majority of the cast (with a few exceptions of course) and since most of the main actors/actresses in this series no longer participate in HK series, I was truly starting to miss them.  The second reason is because, well frankly, I miss watching ancient martial arts/wuxia series due to the fact that TVB doesn’t make these types of series anymore and few of the other countries do either – so I guess you could say that this was my way of temporarily satisfying my ‘wuxia series’ craving…LOL.  Third reason is because I’ve already seen most of the other early 90s Jin Yong ‘prequels’ (i.e. Golden Snake Sword, Rise of the Taiji Master, Mystery of the Condor Hero, etc.) and was able to tolerate those, so I figured I might as well continue the ‘trend’ of watching.  [As a side note…I only write reviews when I have time (and when I feel like it…LOL) so there definitely WON’T be a review for everything I watch.  Out of the 3 series that I listed above, I only wrote a review for Golden Snake Sword, which I actually recommend for those reading this particular review to also read because my overall sentiments toward that series are very similar to this one.  Those interested can check out the review here].

Before I go into the individual performances and characters, a few words about the script and the overall storyline / plot – basically, my advice is this:  don’t take the story too seriously and you’ll be fine.  When I was watching this series, I found a lot of the same problems/flaws that I noticed in the other JY prequels/spinoffs that TVB made back in that time period – the editing was sloppy, the plot was all over the place, some of the story arcs didn’t make a whole lot of sense at times, and the overall production was just plain messy.   Luckily, this series is fast-paced enough that it’s not a ‘chore’ to sit through like some of the others I’ve seen, but if you’re expecting a ‘quality’ production with a ‘good’ script, you definitely WON’T get that with this series!   Despite the messy script, there seems to be something about this series (and the other prequels I mentioned) that somehow draws audiences (well, me at least) into the story and makes us want to ‘root’ for the main couple in each series – in other words, I would find too many flaws to count with each of the series, yet I can’t bring myself to ‘hate’ or ‘dislike’ the series.  Yes, it’s weird, but hey, it’s the truth….

Oh, and another point worth mentioning – especially since those watching the series will for sure notice it – is the ‘exaggerated’ martial arts effects that this series utilizes.  It seems like each time there is a major battle / fight scene in the series, it’s done in an overly deliberate, choppy, slow-motion manner – to the point that it becomes a bit frustrating to watch (for those who are well-versed with watching shows on the Internet, I would describe the effect of those scenes as  ‘buffering gone awry’).  Needless to say, I definitely didn’t like the overuse of the slow-motion technique in this series, which ended up being more of a ‘distraction’ than anything else.

Anyway, here’s the rundown of some of the main characters from the series (not all of them of course) as well as my comments on the artists who portrayed the characters (note that I usually include much of the plot in my character descriptions, so if you prefer not to be ‘spoiled’ with what happens in the series, then my advice is to STOP HERE…):

Cameo roles:

EDDIE KWAN (Tin Sang) – Eddie’s character Tin Sang is a Daoist priest and the third of four apprentice-brothers in a Daoist sect.   Due to his great affinity with the Daoist principles and his ability to quickly understand and master martial arts moves, Tin Sang is pegged as the next leader of the sect by his sifu (played by veteran actor Bau Fong), which also means that he would be responsible for finding and protecting the missing Nine Yin Manual (九陰真經), since it is the most important manual in all of Daoism (hence also making it the most ‘coveted’ manual in the martial arts world).

Of course, as luck would have it, Tin Sang doesn’t end up taking over the sect as leader.  First of all, he doesn’t feel that he is leader material, plus since he is only the 3rd apprentice brother, he feels that the leadership position should rightfully go to the eldest apprentice brother, Seung Sang (played by Newton Lai).  However, Seung Sang  also feels that Tin Sang is the best person for the job and even reprimands Tin Sang for not wanting to take the position (for those who are wondering – yes, Newton actually plays a good guy in this series).  

Anyway, the main reason why Tin Sang doesn’t want to take the position is because he had fallen in love with Cheng Yeuk Si (played by Vivian Chow), a blind orphan living in the woods with whom he had a few chance encounters and ended up curing her eyesight.   Due to an ‘accidental’ situation that happens (a ‘far-fetched’ situation in my opinion – but you’ll need to watch it to judge for yourself), Tin Sang and Yeuk Si end up ‘doing the deed’ and Yeuk Si becomes pregnant because of it .  The two of them do truly love each other, but due to fate, they couldn’t be together – Tin Sang unwillingly abandons Yeuk Si after his sifu dies, as he felt obligated to fulfill his sifu’s last wish of him becoming sect leader (no, he doesn’t know that Yeuk Si is pregnant at this point, otherwise he wouldn’t have left her).   Later on, Tin Sang’s evil second apprentice brother Yuen Sang (played by Lam Seung Mo) captures Yeuk Si and tortures her in the hopes that she will rat out Tin Sang as the father of her unborn child, which would then mean that Tin Sang was no longer qualified to be leader of the sect (keep in mind that in Tin Sang’s position, he is supposed to be sworn to celibacy).  Tin Sang succeeds in saving Yeuk Si, but due to Yuen Sang relentlessly pursuing them, they end up retreating into a huge cave-like place [the famous ‘Ancient Tomb’ from the Return of the Condor Heroes story].  Trapped in the cave, Tin Sang and Yeuk Si reconcile and establish a happy life together, growing ‘love’ flowers [another reference to ROTCH] and anticipating the birth of their child.   In the cave, Tin Sang also accidentally finds the Nine Yin Manual that had been missing for years – he studies the martial arts in the manual and within days (I’m assuming here, since the timeframe in the series is a bit sketchy), he has already learned the highest form of the moves described in the manual (which is extremely ironic given what happens shortly after he leaves the cave).

Not long after that, their baby is born and since it just happened to be on the same day that Tin Sang is supposed to take over the Daoist sect, he decides to leave the cave and return to the sect so that he can renounce his position as well as turn over the Nine Yin Manual to his eldest apprentice brother.  Unfortunately, it was already too late, as the evil Yuen Sang also chose to betray the sect on that day – he sets the entire sect on fire and tries to kill everyone there.  Of course, Yuen Sang’s martial arts at the time is inferior to that of his eldest brother Seung Sang, plus his 3rd brother Tin Sang re-appears right at that time (remember that Tin Sang learned the martial arts from the manual, so Yuen Sang was definitely no match to him either).  Just when it looked like Yuen Sang was being defeated, Yeuk Si shows up with the baby and of course (in typical TVB series fashion), Yuen Sang takes the two of them hostage and threatens Tin Sang to hand over the Nine Yin Manual in exchange for their safety [I’m sure most of us can count how many times a similar story arc has occurred in TVB series].   Somewhere in the process, Yuen Sang pushes Yeuk Si into the fire and she throws the baby into the air – Tin Sang saves the baby and gives him to the eldest brother along with the manual, then tries to go save his wife…needless to say, both Tin Sang and Yeuk Si die in the fire.  This all happens at the beginning of episode 3, so pretty much Eddie and Vivian only guest star for the first 2 ½ episodes.

Performance-wise, Eddie was great as usual!  Despite only having 2 ½ episodes of screen time (plus a bit of a far-fetched story arc with some ridiculous segments), he gave a very convincing performance!  Eddie is one of my favorite actors from the 80s (actually, most of the actors/actresses from that era are on my ‘favorites’ list…LOL) and I can truly say that I’ve enjoyed almost every series of his that I’ve watched from that era (80s and early 90s).  Honestly speaking, Eddie actually didn’t have a whole lot of ‘leading actor’ roles compared to some of the others from that era, but luckily, he did well in all of them, which helped him ‘stand out’ amongst the breadth of talent in those days.  I actually talk quite a bit about Eddie’s acting as well as his most memorable roles in my review of The Swords of Conquest a few years back (those interested can read it here), so I won’t go into too much detail here.  What I will say though is that I wish Eddie had more screen time in this series because I had just finished watching him in Rise of the Taiji Master (another great performance from Eddie!) a few weeks back and was still in my ‘Eddie Kwan’ mode…LOL.  Ah well…I can always go pull out some of his older series from my collection and re-watch those….


VIVIAN CHOW (Cheng Yeuk Si) – Since I told most of Yeuk Si’s story already while describing Eddie Kwan’s character, I won’t go into tremendous detail here (plus there really isn’t a whole lot of development to Vivian’s character in this series anyway, since her screen time is even less than Eddie’s). 

Yeuk Si is a very kind, compassionate woman who lives by herself in a small house in the woods located at the foot of the mountain where a major Daoist sect has its headquarters.  Even though she is blind (I actually don’t remember the details of how she became blind, though her character does talk at length about it), she has a positive outlook on life and spends all her time taking care of the injured animals she often comes across.  She meets the man who will change her life forever (Tin Sang) during a chance encounter when Tin Sang’s eldest apprentice brother Seung Sang is fighting with someone trying to steal the Nine Yin Manual and accidentally injures her in the process.  While Seung Sang runs off to pursue the thief, he tells Tin Sang to take care of Yeuk Si (who was knocked unconscious) as well as tend to her injury.   Tin Sang heals Yeuk Si’s injury, however due to the circumstances, Yeuk Si didn’t understand what had happened and thought that Tin Sang was up to no good.  They part ways, but encounter each other again later and since Yeuk Si doesn’t recognize Tin Sang (due to the fact that she is blind and doesn’t know what he looks like), he befriends her and she accepts him.   Tin Sang finds out Yeuk Si’s background and feels sorry for her plight, so he offers to find a cure for her eyesight – he succeeds in doing so and falls in love with her in the process.  Much of what happens next I already described above, so no point in rehashing all that again…Yeuk Si ends up dying a tragic death together with her love Tin Sang.

I really don’t have too much to say about Vivian’s performance in this series because there is so little to go off of.  Her character is the typical sweet, caring, compassionate type who can also be tough and strong when she needs to be – pretty much the same as Vivian’s personality in real life.  To me, there wasn’t much complexity to Vivian’s character and nothing much interesting about her performance here either.  In all honesty, I really didn’t feel much for Eddie and Vivian as a couple because their love story was so hastily put together and ended so abruptly that I didn’t have time to develop any feelings for them.  Of course, I can understand why their relationship was rushed, since they aren’t the main characters in the series and the purpose of their story was to setup the backdrop for what happens later on involving the ‘true’ main couple (Ekin and Fiona) of the series.  Anyway, since I’ve never been a fan of Vivian’s singing or acting (I’m pretty much ‘neutral’ towards her), not too much comment from me on her performance here.


Main Characters:

EKIN CHENG (Gau Jai / Wong Chung Yeung) – Ekin plays the series’ title character Wong Chung Yeung (which, if you haven’t guessed by now, is the same character mentioned briefly in the LOTCH and ROTCH stories – except keep in mind that this is a fictional prequel to those stories, so a lot of the facts aren’t going to add up). 

Wong Chung Yeung actually did not have a name when he was born, as his parents Tin Sang and Yeuk Si left the Ancient Tomb shortly after he was born and they died not too long after that (pretty much the same day).  After his parents’ death, WCY is raised by his ‘uncle’ (his father’s eldest apprentice brother Seung Sang) and is given the name ‘Gau Jai’ (literally translated as ‘Little Dog’) – however, due to the fact that Seung Sang went insane and lost his memory when he was pushed off a cliff by his 3rd brother Yuen Sang (more on this piece later) -- WCY had no clue about his own or his uncle’s identity and so he thought Seung Sang was truly his father (he called him ‘dad’ during the first half of the series and later when he finds out his true identity, he starts calling Seung Sang his ‘yi-fu’ or ‘adopted father’).  The two of them lived in some tree-house type thing on top of a mountain located in the middle of the woods that was actually very close to where the main Daoist sect compound once was (I know, it’s a bit confusing…LOL).  Once WCY was a grown man, he took to caring for Seung Sang like his own father, cooking for him and tending to his needs like any filial son would do – during this time, Seung Sang would recite some verses from the Nine Yin Manual (which SS still had in his possession, though he had no clue what it was), thereby indirectly ‘teaching’ WCY some martial arts in the process.

WCY was a very playful young lad and since he grew up in the mountains, he was very ‘naïve’ and had no idea what things were like in the ‘real’ world.   He would often go out into the forest and play with the various animals there, since there was no one else around to keep him company besides his ‘dad’, who sometimes would disappear out of the blue and then show up again when he was hungry (keep in mind that his ‘dad’ is a bit insane, so his behavior is bound to be weird and unpredictable).

One day, while ‘playing’ in the forest, he encounters a woman dressed completely in white (another reference to ROTCH…LOL) who is fighting with some Daoist priest person (we find out later that the Daoist priest is actually one of Yuen Sang’s disciples, who by now has become a crazy, evil Daoist high priest).   Being the compassionate guy that he is, WCY gets in between them and tries to stop the woman from hurting the priest, which ticks the woman off big-time (especially since she already has a preconceived notion about men being the root of all evil and loathes all of them, particularly Daoist priests….more on this later).  The priest ends up getting hurt anyway and since the woman thinks that the priest is dead, she goes on her way….(if you haven’t guessed by now, the ‘woman in white’ is Lam Chiu Ying, played by Fiona Leung).

Not long after that, WCY encounters Lam Chiu Ying again, but this time, she is unconscious due to a major injury – he does what any good samaritan would do and tries to save her life…when he saw that she wasn’t getting any better, he innocently puts her in some warm water spring that he had found that was famous in the area for resurrecting people from the dead (or something like that) – only problem is that she was in there unclothed and when she wakes up, she is of course ticked off to no end (this segment was actually kind of funny because WCY, who grew up in the mountains with animals as companions, was totally oblivious to issues of manners and modesty between men and women, so he totally did not understand why the woman was so upset…I loved the interaction between Ekin and Fiona in this scene – he kept innocently asking her whether she felt better and that he hoped the spring would help heal her injury while she’s in there fuming and just wanting him to go away….LOL).   After this, Lam Chiu Ying is hard-set on ‘killing’ WCY (which is understandable given what we know about what she thinks he did) and when she is cured, she chases him down and pushes him off a cliff (of course he doesn’t die – in fact, he doesn’t even have a scratch on him afterwards….typical dramatic effect, right?).  Hence starts the ‘relationship’ between Wong Chung Yeung and Lam Chiu Yeung (albeit they despise each other at first, then later fall in love), which is pretty much the backbone of this entire series (yup, the series is based on the ‘famous’ love story between these two characters that we only hear small snippets of in ROTCH – but keep in mind that this series is FICTIONAL, so the story evolves totally different from what we are used to hearing in the past…sorry for the redundancy, but this is such an important point to make that I feel the need to keep repeating it, especially since the ending is going to be a shocker for those who are too used to the ‘original’ story).

As the story evolves, WCY also meets Yuen Ngan Fung (played by Gallen Lo), who is a kind-hearted (at first), intelligent, righteous, and very well-mannered Kam prince (those who are familiar with LOTCH and ROTCH will probably remember the background history of the animosity between the Han people and the ‘foreigners’ from the country of Kam due to the battles over power, money, land, etc.).  Ah Fung is different from his fellow Kam comrades in that he has always felt that there shouldn’t be any separation between Han and Kam and advocates both groups co-existing in peace and harmony.  This is one reason why he and WCY become best friends (though in the beginning, WCY doesn’t know that Ah Fung is a prince) – they also experience many life and death situations together and even learn martial arts together at one point.   The two of them even fall for the same woman at first– the kind-hearted and naïve Fok Mo Sheung (played by Money Lo)… (well, in WCY’s case, it was more ‘like’ than ‘love’, since he was obviously ‘meant’ for Lam Chiu Ying…)…in the end, Mo Sheung chooses Ah Fung but remains good friends with WCY.   The rest of the series is pretty much about Wong Chung Yeung’s relationship with Lam Chiu Ying as well as the affinity he has with Daoism, which culminates in the end with WCY becoming the leader of the Daoist sect.

I actually quite liked Ekin’s portrayal of WCY in this series.  Like I said in my review of Golden Snake Sword, I’ve always felt that Ekin has that ‘martial arts warrior’ look and feel, which is probably why he constantly portrayed those types of characters back in the day.  The difference with this particular character (Wong Chung Yeung) as opposed to some of his other ‘tragic hero’ roles is that there is no ‘mean streak’ in his character whatsoever (many of his previous characters were those ‘borderline good/bad’ type roles).  Ekin’s character is actually quite well-developed in the series, as we get to see him evolve from a playful, naïve young lad to a mature wuxia hero with a compassionate heart – his portrayal was quite natural!


FIONA LEUNG (Lam Chiu Ying) – I talked a bit about Fiona’s character Lam Chiu Ying earlier…before I elaborate further though, I have to once again give the ‘fictional prequel’ disclaimer:  if you’re a Jin Yong fan (especially a die-hard one), I strongly urge you to throw out (at least for the time being) whatever you know about the character of Lam Chiu Ying from his novels when you watch this series – otherwise, you will likely get very frustrated and possibly confused with the way her story evolves in this series.

Lam Chiu Ying was raised by her mother Lam Ling So and throughout her entire life, she had no clue who her father was – her mother would only tell her that her father is dead and the person responsible for his death is a Daoist priest named Wong Seung (aka Seung Sang).   Due to her mother’s influence and ‘brainwashing’, Chiu Ying grew up to be a cold, distant woman whose sole mission in life is to kill Wong Seung – she was also taught by her mother that all men are heartless and as a woman, she should never trust a man with her love because he will abandon her in the end.  This is why when Chiu Ying first encounters Wong Chung Yung, she immediately takes a disliking to him (WCY doesn’t really like her in the beginning either, though with his personality, he’s friendly to everyone pretty much, so he’s still nice to her). 

As fate would have it, Chiu Ying encounters WCY again and again – later on, due to a misunderstanding, she thinks that WCY knows where Wong Seung is, so she befriends him and stays by his side in the hopes that she can find Wong Seung through him. [As a side note – during this time, WCY actually DOESN’T know that his ‘father’ Seung Sang is actually Wong Seung or that Chiu Ying’s mission is to kill Seung Sang].   It’s not until way later when Seung Sang is reunited with his 4th Daoist brother Lien Sang (played by Lee Sing Cheong) that he eventually regains his memory and is able to tell WCY his true identity as well as relay the story of how his parents met and how they died.

Of course, Wong Chung Yeung and Lam Chiu Ying eventually fall in love with each other.  One time, while fleeing the murderous Yuen Sang (who, 20 years later, is still trying to kill his Daoist brothers so that he can get his hands on the missing pages of the Nine Yin Manual that he needs in order to master the highest level of martial arts), WCY and Chiu Ying find the Ancient Tomb and take refuge there (remember that this is the same Ancient Tomb that WCY’s parents fled to 20 years ago and the place where he was born).  WCY discovers some verses from the Nine Yin Manual that his father had written and due to his high affinity for Daoism, he was able to master the martial arts moves contained in the verses fairly quickly.  Then, for a reason that I didn’t fully understand (and still don’t), WCY falls ill and almost dies, but Chiu Ying is right there by his side and saves him – from that moment on, they declare their love for each other and swear that no matter what happens, they will not let the other die alone.

As is typical with these types of story arcs, the relationship between WCY and Chiu Ying is put to the test later on when WCY discovers that the person Chiu Ying has been trying to kill all along is his adopted father Seung Sang (kind of ironic, since Seung Sang is actually Chiu Ying’s biological father – more on this piece later).  Things take a turn for the worst when Seung Sang is killed with a sword through his chest – since the sword was Chiu Ying’s and she was at the scene when Seung Sang died, plus she had had been trying to kill him all along (she actually didn’t kill him though – she refused to kill Seung Sang once she found out he was really her father), WCY mistook Chiu Ying as the killer and without listening to her explanation, he lashed out at her, hurting her in the process.  They part ways and even though WCY doesn’t want to have anything to do with her anymore, Chiu Ying still loves him and pines for him – her hair eventually turns white because of it (so basically, she inadvertently follows in her mother’s footsteps, as her mother was also ‘rejected’ by the man she loved and her hair turned all white due to pining for him all these years). 

When Chiu Ying finds out that WCY has decided to become a Daoist priest and take up the responsibility of leading the main Daoist sect, she realizes that her mother was right about men being heartless.  She becomes angry and bitter at being rejected so ‘cruelly’ by the man she loved and from that point, views WCY as her enemy.  Even though she agrees to collaborate with him in order to kill their mutual enemy Yuen Sang, she doesn’t want anything to do with him after that and even admits to killing his adopted father Seung Sang in order to make him hate her.

Since I don’t want to spoil things too much, I won’t go into great detail about the ending.  All I’m going to say is that WCY eventually finds out the truth of who killed Seung Sang and realizes that he had wronged Chiu Ying. They do eventually reconcile (though not right away), WCY renounces his position as leader of the Daoist sect and retreats to the Ancient Tomb with Chiu Ying, where they hoped to spend the rest of their lives together.  I’m not going to reveal the ending, but knowing that Wong Chung Yeung eventually DOES become the leader of the Daoist sect (the script did stay true to that part of the story), I’m sure it’s not too hard to guess what Lam Chiu Ying’s fate ends up being.

In terms of performance – ok, maybe I’m a bit biased, but I felt that Fiona was awesome in this series!  Fiona is one of my favorite actresses and just like many of the actresses from the 80s/early 90s era, she is quite versatile in that she can portray a variety of roles and be convincing in all of them.   Whether she’s playing a sweet, docile, reserved woman with no martial arts background whatsoever or a bitter, angry, spited woman out for revenge, or even a loud-mouthed tomboy (those are just a few of the roles I’ve seen her in – there are many more that are worth watching), she handles each of the roles well.  In fact, part of the reason why I decided to watch Rage and Passion in the first place was because I was in my ‘Fiona’ mood (having just re-watched State of Divinity for the nth time and Rise of the Taiji Master for the first time…both series that she starred in).  Also, since Fiona officially left the entertainment industry several years ago and won’t be filming ‘regular’ TV series ever again, I was really starting to miss her, so I sort of did a ‘marathon’ of her previous series.   One of the things that amazes me about Fiona is how much chemistry she has with each of the male co-stars she has been paired with in each of her series – it’s rare for an actress to have such great on-screen chemistry with each of her partners…that’s one of the things I miss most about Fiona!

Lastly…just a little bit of background on Fiona, since she retired from the industry more than a decade ago and was last active in the TV industry back in the mid-90s, so some audiences today might not be too familiar with her.  Fiona was discovered by a talent scout in the 80s and started off filming commercials – then, in 1987, she participated in TVB’s Super New Talent (超級新星大賽) contest where she won first place in her category (there were 2 winners from that contest – for the females, it was Fiona Leung and for the males, it was Nixon Pang).  Of course, she signed with TVB that year and participated in her very first series -- 1987’s mega production Legend of the Book and the Sword (書劍恩仇), where she was one of the female leads.  She was active in the TV and movie industries up until the mid-90s or so, but then her career started going downhill, so she decided to change careers and get out of acting completely.   In the early 2000s (2001/2002 or so), Fiona became a Christian and since then, has devoted her life to her religion (she currently works for The Media Evangelism Association, which is a Christian organization that utilizes multi-media and other technological methods to spread the Gospel and do God’s work).  She mostly does hosting work now for TMEA’s various evangelistic programs and has participated in a few of the movies they’ve produced (along with our famous Christian celebrities in HK).


NEWTON LAI (Seung Sang / Wong Seung) – Since I talked quite a bit about Newton’s character in my earlier character descriptions, I’ll just fill in the gaps here…

As the eldest brother of the Daoist sect, Seung Sang is highly respected and revered by his juniors, especially since he is the most  ‘righteous’ amongst the 4 brothers.  He is very dedicated to Daoism and is also highly skilled in martial arts, however his affinity with the Daoist principles isn’t as great as his 3rd brother Tin Sang, so he supports his sifu’s decision to make Tin Sang the sect leader instead of himself.  He is an innately good person and remains so throughout the series, even when he loses his memory and later on when he dies. 

Seung Sang understands full well that as a Daoist priest, he is supposed to cut all ties with women and live a life of celibacy, which he follows to the core.  This is why he always got annoyed to no end when his 2nd brother Yuen Sang’s sister Lam Ling So – herself a Daoist nun (sorry if the word is wrong, as I’m not familiar with Daoist terminology) – would constantly chase after him, trying to get him to accept her (obviously she had a huge crush on him).  He would always avoid her like the plague whenever he could and sometimes would even reprimand her for betraying Daoist principles.  Being a willful, obstinate woman, Lam Ling So was obsessed with Seung Sang and had no qualms about doing whatever it took to get what she wanted. 

After Tin Sang and his wife Yeuk Si died, Seung Sang tried to go into hiding with their baby as well as the Nine Yin Manual – unfortunately, Yuen Sang is hot on his trail and ends up forcing Seung Sang into a small cave-like place (no, not the Ancient Tomb).  Lam Ling So happens to come along (too much of a coincidence, no?) and seeing her opportunity, she sets off an aphrodisiac that she had gotten, which of course causes Seung Sang to lose his senses and “do the deed” with her.  When he comes to his senses, he is ticked off at what Lam Ling So did (the aphrodisiac thing) and berates her, refusing to take responsibility for what happened.  Angry at being rejected, Lam Ling So grabs the Nine Yin Manual and runs out of the cave.  Seung Sang chases after her (with the baby in tow) and attempts to get the manual back – unfortunately, he forgets that Yuen Sang is waiting outside.   The 3 of them fight over the manual and in the chaos, the manual gets split 3 ways – thinking that he got majority of the manual, Yuen Sang pushes Seung Sang off the cliff. 

Amazingly (well, maybe not, since this IS a TVB drama series after all), Seung Sang and the baby both survive the fall, though Seung Sang does go crazy after that and loses his memory (he probably hit his head).  Next thing we know, it’s 20 years later (that was quick…lol) and somehow, Seung Sang managed to raise the baby despite his craziness.   

He basically appears here and there throughout the next couple episodes until he finally regains his memory.    He is no longer interested in leading the Daoist sect and only wants to retire to a life of peace; unfortunately though, Lam Ling So has been pursuing him this entire time, as she is angry and bitter at being rejected by him and wants him to suffer the most hellish fate.  As described in the previous sections, he is killed by Yuen Sang, but not before finding out that Lam Chiu Ying is actually his daughter – right before he dies, he scolds Lam Ling So for being so cruel to their daughter in trying to force her to kill her own father. 

Newton gave an amazing performance in this series, especially during the episodes when he had lost his memory and would wander around the woods like a mad man – the way his character would innocently pop in and out of various situations was actually kind of funny.  Then, when he regained his memory back, he went back to being the overly serious and reserved person that he used to be – the transformation was actually quite significant, yet Newton handled the role perfectly.  I’ve actually liked Newton as an actor ever since his stellar performance in the 1986 version of New Heaven Sword and Dragon Sabre (a series I’ve re-watched at least 20 times if not more…lol) and even though he was  known for playing villain roles (his most famous villain role was in ATV series The Legendary Fok back in the early 80s and subsequently in his career, he sort of got typecasted into those types of roles), he was actually quite versatile in his acting.  He retired from the industry in the mid/late 90s and immigrated to Canada with his family, though he did return to HK later and switched to doing business, still occasionally guest starring in series here and there in the after 2000s era (though most of his roles by that time were not very significant).  Sadly, Newton passed away last year (it was reported that he died of complications from pneumonia) – I actually was quite devastated because we lost quite a few veteran artists the last 2 years (Austin Wai and Jacqueline Law in 2012; Newton Lai, So Hang Suen and Kong Ngai in 2013) – since I grew up watching all of these artists on TV, it was difficult for me to hear of them passing one after the other.   Nowadays, when I watch / re-watch series with these artists in them, I can’t help but be saddened by how much talent we lost….


MARY HON (Lam Ling So) – Lam Ling So is truly a tragic character from beginning to end – though it could be argued that she inflicted a lot of the pain she suffered on herself, her plight is still a sad one nonetheless.   Her biggest mistake was trying to force a man who didn’t and couldn’t love her to actually love her and take responsibility for an action that she caused.  Then, when he refuses to take responsibility, the love that she had for him turns into hate and she subsequently plots to have him suffer the worst fate possible – to be killed by his very own daughter.  In a sense, this proved how selfish and delirious Lam Ling So was, as all she wanted was to take revenge against the man who spited her, even if it meant sacrificing her own daughter in order to so.  [In comparisons, her daughter Lam Chiu Ying was much more noble – despite her mother’s actions, Chiu Ying never gave up on her mother and continued protecting her, even if it meant risking her own life to do so…the death scene where Chiu Ying holds her mother’s lifeless body in her arms and weeps at having forever lost someone she loved so dearly was very very sad (and very very well acted by both Mary Hon and Fiona Leung)]. 

After Seung Sang’s death, Lam Ling So loses her mind, as it’s at that moment that she realizes she still loved Seung Sang all these years and actually didn’t want him to die – but she realizes all of this too late…the damage is already done.   She wanders off by herself, unable to accept the fact that Seung Sang is dead, and continually tries to ‘find’ him after that (similar to what she had been doing the past 20 years).  In the end, she dies a tragic death at the hands of her evil brother Yuen Sang, but not without first helping Wong Chung Yung understand the truth of how Seung Sang died, thereby clearing Lam Chiu Ying’s name. 

In the beginning, I actually despised the character of Lam Ling So, as I felt that her stubborn insistence on getting what she wanted at all costs was way too selfish and through her actions, she brought so much pain on others.  Plus she is also the catalyst for Wong Chung Yung’s misunderstanding and subsequent anger toward Lam Chiu Ying for supposedly killing his adopted father, the results of which, as I described above, are devastating on Chiu Ying (again, I’m probably a bit biased here too because Lam Chiu Ying was my favorite character in this series).

By the end of the series however, I could no longer bring myself to despise Lam Ling So – in fact, I felt tremendous pity for her when she FINALLY ‘wakes up’ and realizes how wrong she was in wanting Seung Sang to die…the pain and regret of this drives her mad and so after that, she decides to live in her own world of denial.  She further redeems herself (in my book at least) when she inadvertently helps WCY find out that Yuen Sang was actually the one who killed Seung Sang and that he had misunderstood Chiu Ying all along.  In her final act of ‘redemption’ (which occurs while she lies dying in her daughter’s arms), she tells WCY that Chiu Ying’s hair turned all white because of him and after everything Chiu Ying suffered due to his rejection, she implored him not to let her daughter down again.   At that moment, it was obvious to me that despite all she had done, deep down, she truly did love her daughter and regretted hurting her.  I actually got a little teary-eyed watching that scene….

From a performance perspective, Mary Hon once again did an excellent job with her role!  Mary Jeh (as everyone calls her) is another one of those amazing veteran actresses who is always so good at what she does.  Of course, it should come as no surprise, as she has been acting since way back when (even before I was born…lol) and has played so many different characters over the years that there’s no doubt she will do a great job.  Mary Jeh truly brought her character to life for me – though I despised Lam Ling So’s actions as well as her selfishness, I was also able to feel for her on an emotional level (her anguish at being rejected, her pain and regret at causing the death of the only man she ever loved, the helplessness of having to live in denial because she couldn’t accept what had happened, etc.).  I think that if it were another actress playing Lam Ling So, I probably would not have such strong feelings for the character.   Actually, I often feel the same way with most of Mary Jeh’s performances – even if I don’t like the series itself, I almost always enjoy her performance.


GALLEN LO (Yuen Ngan Fung) – I talked a little bit about Gallen’s character Yuen Ngan Fung earlier on, but of course there is much more to him than what was mentioned earlier.  Ah Fung starts off as a good guy for most of the series, but later on, he goes down the path of evil after enduring much suffering at the hands of his younger brother Yuen Ngan Bat (who not only kills their father but also takes over the throne that rightfully belonged to Ah Fung).  In addition, Ah Fung encountered one setback after another in his relationship with Fok Mo Sheung, whom he truly did love – since Ah Fung was a Kam prince, Mo Sheung’s parents hated him and refused to let their daughter date him (this has to do with the Kam vs. Han thing I mentioned earlier).  Mo Sheung’s father especially despised Ah Fung, which make sense, since he is an extremely righteous general who dedicates his entire life to fighting the Kams and rescuing his own people (the Hans) from oppression – with that type of background, it’s expected for him to treat all Kam people as enemies. 

Not surprisingly, Ah Fung and his best friend Wong Chung Yeung eventually drift apart, as the paths that they are expected to follow become drastically different:  Ah Fung is determined to get back what he had lost (the royal Kam throne) while WCY is set to become the leader of the Daoist sect, the goal of which is to free the Han people from oppression under the Kams.  The biggest problem though is that Ah Fung becomes a completely different person after his ordeal  -- he becomes hungry for power and longs to learn the highest form of martial arts possible (especially since by this time, WCY is already highly skilled in martial arts and Ah Fung is no match for him in that area).  Therefore, when WCY and Chiu Ying collaborate and defeat Yuen Sang, Ah Fung secretly saves him behind their backs and forces Yuen Sang to teach him martial arts from the Nine Yin Manual.  Of course, since Ah Fung doesn’t have the affinity with martial arts that WCY does, he has no choice but to learn the ‘shortcut’ version, which as we know from all those wuxia stories, is the most damaging to the person’s body and mind.  Needless to say, after Yuen Sang dies, Ah Fung ‘replaces’ him as the primary villain in the series – not only does he end up killing Mo Sheung’s dad, he also pretty much wipes out the entire Daoist sect.  Later on, he also inadvertently kills his own wife Mo Sheung, which sort of makes him crazy (since it truly was an accident and he didn’t mean to do it, plus he did love her dearly).  In the end, there is a big ‘battle to the death’ between Ah Fung and Wong Chung Yeung – I’m sure you can guess who wins that one!

Gallen’s performance as the Kam prince Yuen Ngan Fung was actually quite good (keep in mind that this was around the time when Gallen was just starting to rise to lead status at TVB, having struggled as a supporting actor prior to that).  As the villain, of course Gallen is only the 2nd male lead in this series (that’s the pattern that most TVB series took at that time – the ‘good guy’ was the main lead and the ‘bad guy’ was the 2nd lead), but his performance still stood out, especially as compared to his earlier performances in the 80s (remember how ‘wooden’ his acting was in his first few series?).  One thing that TVB actually did right with Gallen’s career back then was casting him as a villain in a bunch of series in the early/mid-90s, as we all know that there is more opportunity for development with villain roles  (the ‘good guy’ roles are more limited in comparisons) and the artists have more chance to shine.  Though I wouldn’t say that Gallen’s character or performance in Rage and Passion was particularly extraordinary (it was actually very similar to his other ‘foreign prince’ roles in those other Jin Yong prequels and remakes), he did a pretty good job here, especially during those scenes when he had to go from good to evil….can’t compare to his later series of course (the ones from the late 90s and early 2000s), but for ‘rising star’ period, it was fine.


MONEY LO  (Fok Mo Sheung) – I actually don’t have a whole lot to say about Money’s character Fok Mo Sheung other than she is the daughter of a general who was originally thought to be dead (her dad is played by Cheung Yik and her mom is played by Wu Mai Yee).  Mo Sheung is the typical ‘innocent good girl’ character who is steadfastly obedient to her parents except for when it comes to matters of love – once she falls in love with Ah Fung, she is forever smitten and there is no turning back (I know, so stereotypical, eh?).  She is pretty much loyal to Ah Fung even to the end, when she finds out that he killed her father and even when he accidentally kills her too.  My opinion of Mo Sheung is that she is a one-dimensional, boring character that the series technically could have done without.

In terms of the acting…well, as I mentioned in one of my previous reviews, I’ve never been able to stand Money Lo as an actress.  For me, she was actually tolerable in this series, but I think that’s because I’ve seen a few of her previous series where her performance was much worse, so this was actually one of the decent ones (or it could be that I did forward many of her scenes, since I wasn’t too interested in her character or her storyline with Gallen….after all, I decided to watch this series primarily because of Fiona and the other cast, remember?).  I still feel that Money should have kept her ‘day job’ at that time (she was a very successful host for TVB) because she was way better at that than acting – which is why it makes sense that she eventually became a lawyer in real life (and a mighty good one at that).


WAYNE LAI (Chow Bak Tung) – I’m sure everyone is familiar with the character of Chow Bak Tung (yes, the same character from LOTCH and ROTCH, except the younger version).  Of course, the background of the character is a bit different in this series, though the personality traits are very much the same…in fact, I feel that Chow Bak Tung was the only character in this series that was portrayed almost exactly the same way that we’re used to seeing in Jin Yong’s works (which is a bit ironic because remember that we’re technically supposed to wipe the original story and characters from our minds when watching this series).  Chow Bak Tung is pretty much the ‘comic relief’ in an otherwise dramatic series that would have been depressingly tragic if it weren’t for his character (I mean, let’s be honest here – in a series where basically all the characters die except for like two or three lone survivors…if that’s not tragic, I don’t know what is!). 

Instead of describing the character in detail like I did with the others, I’m going to skip straight to the performance on this one (no need to describe the character because like I said, he’s basically the only character in this series who is written almost identical to the original story in terms of personality traits, how he interacts with others, how he reacts to situations, etc.).

Those who are familiar with Wayne Lai’s portrayal of Chow Bak Tung from the 90s remakes of LOTCH and ROTCH will no doubt enjoy his performance in this series, as he’s a natural when it comes to this character and is able to portray Chow Bak Tung with ease…though to be honest, I actually prefer his Chow Bak Tung here than in the actual remakes because this is the younger version, which was more fitting to his age at the time – the one in the remakes was way older and having Wayne portray the character at that age just seemed weird to me (I grew up in the 80s, so naturally, I’m used to the 80s versions of LOTCH and ROTCH where  Chow Bak Tung was played by Chun Wong – he will always be the best ‘mature’ version of Chow Bak Tung in my book!).   Of course, seeing that Wayne is one of my favorite actors, I of course loved his performance in this series (not much complaint from me, as he had the character down perfectly).  Wayne’s chemistry with the entire cast was amazingly good and I especially enjoyed all his scenes with his ‘sifu’ Lee Sing Cheong as well as with Ekin and Newton.

I’m actually quite glad that I got to see Wayne’s ‘comedic’ performance in this series because as much as I love him as an actor (and as a person), his roles recently haven’t been as good as the ones he had in the past (Wayne’s acting is still up to par, it’s just that the characters he’s given by TVB to portray nowadays are all very similar).  In fact, ever since Wayne was promoted to first lead status back in 2009, he hasn’t portrayed any comedic or ‘comic relief’ type roles, so I was really starting to miss that side of him.  Watching his performance in this series brought back the ‘old’ Wayne for me, so definitely happy with that!  J


LAM SEUNG MO (Yuen Sang) – I won’t go too much into Yuen Sang’s character either, since I talked about him a lot already in the earlier descriptions.  He’s obviously the villain in the series – a man so evil to the core that by the end of the series, I find myself wishing that he dies an awful death (I’m talking about the character of course).   Yuen Sang’s character is actually the instigator for much of what happens in the series and for all but the last 2-3 episodes, he is basically the ‘common enemy’ that every character in the series is trying to defeat.  Of course, Yuen Sang does die in the end (though whether his death was ‘awful’ enough is really subject to interpretation), but by that time, he had already done so much damage that killing him off just seemed too ‘good’ for him.

Anyway…performance-wise, Lam Sir was great in his portrayal as usual.  In fact, I would say that his portrayal of the character was so over-the-top scary that during several of the scenes, his character actually gave me the creeps (especially in the last few episodes where he is chained up in a dungeon).  Lam Sir is another great veteran actor who is very versatile in that he can play different types of roles equally well.  I’ve seen him play the ‘benevolent father’ roles as well as the ‘evil to the core’ villain roles and all of them are done quite convincingly.

.---.

There were actually a few more characters in the series that would have been worth a mention as well, but seeing that I hit most of the main ones (plus this review is way too long already), I decided to just leave it at what I have written.

Overall, I felt this series was decent and pretty much in-line with most of the other fictional prequels of Jin Yong’s works that were made around that time.  Though the script is heavily flawed and some of the plot is a bit far-fetched (plus the editing is borderline horrible), the acting (from most of the cast), the story, and the chemistry of the cast pretty much make up for it.

In terms of recommendation – well, I feel the same way about this series like I do towards the other prequels:   fans of the artists should definitely watch because most likely you will still enjoy the series despite its flaws;  those who have been craving wu xia/martial arts ancient series should probably watch because there is plenty of ‘action’ (i.e. fighting scenes) to keep fans of martial arts series satisfied.  As for Jin Yong fans – it’s pretty much ‘watch at your own risk’…if you are able to ignore the inconsistencies and ‘inaccuracies’ from the original stories and just take the series for what it is – again, a ‘fictional’ story independent of Jin Yong – then hopefully you should be fine.