Since the beginning, I had stated that I feel having 100% audience vote for TV King and Queen is a stupid idea because it makes the awards lose even more credibility (not that they had much credibility to begin with, but with this OVPP thing, the little bit of ‘respectability’ that the awards still had went completely down the drain). It pretty much turns these awards into a ‘popularity contest’ whereby the artists with the most number of fans voting for them wins, since we all know that most fans will vote for their idols out of loyalty, irregardless of how they actually perform acting-wise that year.
Despite how much I oppose the OVPP thing, I must say that I also hate TVB’s previous method of determining the winners – combining the ‘votes’ from audiences, TVB producers, and TVB management (aka the ‘high up execs’). To me, TVB management has no place in determining the winners because they are so biased, it’s not even funny – plus many of the execs are ‘business people’ who have no experience in actually ‘making series’ (acting / scriptwriting / producing / directing, etc.), so what right do they have to ‘judge’ who does the best job in acting?
For the record, my ‘preference’ when it comes to determining the winners of these types of awards is to have a professional judging panel consisting of industry ‘experts’ (i.e.: producers, directors, scriptwriters, fellow actors/actresses, etc.) who can truly judge the quality of the acting and the series without bias. It’s just like with singing competitions, where the ‘judges’ are usually singing teachers, music producers, songwriters, veteran singers, etc. – that type of judging panel makes sense because those people are ‘qualified’ to judge singing skill, technique, etc., due to their expertise in ‘making music’.
As for the article below about TVB’s decision to implement OVPP for the Anniversary Awards – the only thing I have to say is that I felt Mr. Tsang Sing Ming’s responses were extremely LAME…in fact, I actually feel that he didn’t really answer some of the question and instead gave one of those general, vague responses that doesn’t truly address the issue. But oh well – I’m already used to those types of answers from TVB, so no point in getting worked up over it….let’s just wait and see what happens come awards time!
.****.
TVB to implement ‘One Vote Per Person’ method to
choose TV King/Queen; Spokesperson won’t
rule out possibility that ‘loopholes’ exist
Source: SinaNews
Translation: llwy12
Despite the fiasco created by the voting failure
at the Miss Hong Kong pageant earlier this year, TVB is still very much
interested in continuing to utilize the ‘One Vote Per Person’ (OVPP) method for
future programs. On October 25th,
via a phone interview, our reporter was able to obtain confirmation that TVB
will once again be utilizing the ‘One Vote Per Person’ method at this year’s
TVB Anniversary Awards to choose the winners in 3 categories: Best Actor (TV King), Best Actress (TV
Queen), and Best Series.
Earlier, when TVB utilized the OVPP method for
the Miss Hong Kong pageant, the process failed due to ‘technical problems’,
resulting in severe criticism from the general public. Even with the ‘technical problems’ seemingly
resolved now, new questions surrounding the OVPP process have arisen –
including the biggest question of all: “If
the audiences vote to determine TV King and Queen, what happens to the
‘professional’ aspect of the awards?”
Audiences vote for ‘the Best’, rest of the awards don’t change
Heading into anniversary season, the yearly TVB
Anniversary Awards has become a hot topic of discussion as usual. A few days ago, TVB released the results of
the investigation into the Miss HK voting failure – the report stated that the
voting outage had nothing to do with hackers [as previously suspected], but
rather resulted from ‘technical’ problems. [TN:
according to the official report, users attempted to vote multiple times in
order to increase their chances of winning the car, resulting in a high volume
of transactions that exceeded a predefined limit for the specific time frame and
thereby crashing the system.] With
the investigation complete, TVB has plans to continue utilizing this method in
future events.
On October 25th, our reporter called
up TVB’s director of external affairs Tsang Sing Ming (曾醒明). He expressed that TVB has already confirmed
that they will utilize the ‘One Vote Per Person’ method to determine the
winners of the Best Actor, Best Actress, and Best Series awards at this year’s
ceremony, however the method for determining the rest of the awards won’t
change for now. Mr. Tsang also revealed
that the anniversary awards ceremony itself will likely go through a process
change this year – the ‘other’ awards will be determined more in advance so
that the last 3 days leading up to the ceremony will be reserved for audiences
to vote on the 3 ‘main’ awards: “By
giving audiences 3 days to vote, we can avoid the issue we had during Miss HK
where too many people voting at the same time paralyzed the system.”
Mr. Tsang continues: “Nowadays, many younger audiences prefer
using the Internet rather than television --
the HK television industry is considering a better way to attract these
younger audiences to participate. The
‘One Vote Per Person’ method can be conducted over the Internet, which is more
convenient compared to the ‘old’ way of having to fill out a form.” From the Miss HK pageant to the Anniversary
Awards, it seems that TVB has become especially fond of the ‘audience vote’
method – Mr. Tsang explains that this will become a ‘trend’ in the future of HK
television.
The ones with most fans win, lacks credibility
In the eyes of many industry insiders, the method
of OVPP becoming a more formalistic ‘trend’ in the industry is definitely cause
for concern. TV Series Magazine’s《電視劇》Editor Sui Chak (水澤) [specializes in writing about TVB series and
artists] expressed that he does not see a good future for the OVPP method.
Sui Chak states that a bit of ‘controversy’
already existed in the previous method of choosing the winners for TV King /
Queen [TN: previous method was a
combination of audience, TVB producers, and TVB executives votes], but at
least the “underlying basis for determining the winners was based on acting --
plus in the past few years, non-management contract artists, such as Sheren
Tang (鄧萃雯) for example, were
able to win, which is proof that things were getting better. Applying the OVPP
method would cause the awards to become ‘popularity’ awards instead where the
artist who has the most fans wins – this lacks credibility and is unfair to the
older, ‘talent-path’ veterans who may not have such a large fanbase. In terms of Best Series, many audiences don’t
consider whether the series is truly good or not – most of the time, audiences
will support a series merely because of their idols. Fans will likely vote for a series because
their idols star in them, but do they really think that the series is
good? Probably not.” According to Sui Chak’s analysis, if TVB
utilizes the OVPP method, the winner of the TV King award will “without a doubt
be Raymond Lam because when it comes to popularity, no other artist can surpass
him.”
Sui Chak continues: “The ‘One Vote Per Person’ method should
actually be used for the ‘Favorite Male / Female Character’ awards – there
would be no problems with 100% audience vote with these 2 awards because by
virtue, these are ‘popularity’-based awards anyway. As for the other awards, those should be
determined by the management team and producers – the ‘professional’ versus
‘popularity’ awards should remain separate.”
Sui Chak feels that by implementing the OVPP method [for the Anniversary
Awards], TVB seems to be going in the wrong direction.
Q & A with Tsang Sing Ming
The ‘concern’ over the OVPP situation seems to
have divided on-line fans of TVB series into 2 groups: while some netizens / fans feel that using
the OVPP method can reduce the ‘cannon fodder’ resulting from TVB’s notorious
‘party politics’, an even larger group of netizens / fans are worried about the
‘fairness’ factor [TN: artists winning based purely on number of
fans rather than performance]. The
concerns of these netizens can be summarized into 4 main questions, which our
reporter took the opportunity to ask TVB’s spokesperson Tsang Sing Ming over
the phone (see below). Mr. Tsang admits
“that ‘loopholes’ definitely do exist in the process, however we won’t know [how
it’ll turn out] until we try it.”
Question 1: Certain
artists have large fanbases, so naturally they will receive the most number of
votes. However, wouldn’t this be unfair
to those artists who truly perform [act] well but don’t have as many fans?
Tsang’s response: We cannot deny the fact that artists with
large fanbases have more of an advantage.
However if these artists were truly able to gain so much support and
‘influence’ so many people to rally behind them in the first place, then it
proves that the artist must already have a certain solid foundation – in that
case, winning the award is understandable.
Question 2: Prior to
this, there were already 2 ‘popularity’ awards chosen mostly by audience votes
– the ‘Favorite Male Character’ and ‘Favorite Female Character’ awards. Now that the TV King and Queen awards will be
decided by audience vote as well, then wouldn’t the 2 awards essentially mean
the same thing?
Tsang’s response: For the ‘Favorite Male / Female Character’
awards, we will be utilizing a combined audience vote + professional judges
method to determine the winners, which will help differentiate them from the TV
King / Queen awards. As to the specific criteria
that the judges will utilize, we will continue to study it and hopefully come
up with the most suitable solution.
Question 3: What
about the possibility of overzealous fans voting repeatedly for their idols,
thereby creating duplicate votes?
Tsang’s response: We will be using the same system that we did for the Miss HK voting
earlier – each person must register using their HK identification card number
and each ID number will only be allowed to vote once. This will be able to prevent people from voting
multiple times.
Question 4: For the
‘Best Series’ award, won’t the series that air closest to the anniversary
period have the greatest advantage, since these series will still be fresh in
audience’s minds? So this means that
series such as The Hippocratic Crush 《OnCall36小時》, which aired close to 6 months ago, won’t have
much of a chance, since audiences have likely forgotten about those series
already?
Tsang’s response: That’s why we arrange for certain grand
production ‘anniversary series’ to air around anniversary time. Anniversary series do have a little more
advantage, since audiences usually pay more attention to them. True, other series might possibly be affected
a bit, but if the series are truly ‘good series’, we believe that audiences will
still have a deep impression of them.
.---.
Producer Chong Wai Kin responds:
“It’s only a ‘program’!”
Compared to the many ‘concerns’ that netizens
have, people within TVB seem to have a more ‘relaxed’ attitude toward the OVPP
issue.
This year, producer Chong Wai Kin (莊偉建) has anniversary series Silver Spoon, Sterling Shackles《名媛望族》in the running – the series just started airing
and already, it has received much acclaim from the general public. However, in the face of the new ‘One Vote Per
Person’ method this year, whether the series will be able to hold its own
against the series manned by the younger, popular idols remains to be
seen. Towards this, Chong Wai Kin
candidly states that it doesn’t matter to him:
“We have to give it a try in order to know if it’s going to work!” The way he sees it, the purpose for
implementing this type of method is to attract more audiences: “After all, the previous method was used for
too long already – audiences are tired of it.”
As for netizens’ concern that using OVPP will cause the awards to become
‘popularity’ awards, Chong Wai Kin admits that he is not too concerned with
it: “Actually, whether a series is good
or not, everyone already has their own ‘conclusion’ about it. Therefore, the way I see it, this awards
thing is merely a ‘program’!” [TN: My interpretation of Chong Wai Kin’s last
comment: ‘people are making a big fuss
over this unnecessarily…]
I think it would have been better if fans voted for My Fav Character instead of Best.
ReplyDelete@miriamfanz: Yup, definitely! I think that's the opinion of majority audiences because that's what makes the most sense. But of course, leave it up to TVB to go forward with yet another stupid move! Let's see what happens come awards time....maybe if the negative reaction from audiences is strong enough, they might decide to change their minds after all.....
DeleteCompletely agree My Fav male and female character would've made more sense for the audience to vote! I haven't watched TVB series almost this entire year so I don't really care about the award results. And since my favorite actor and actress Ruco and Kristal don't have any popular roles this year, I'm even less interested. The only awards I care for is Best supporting actors for Koo Miu Wah, and Most improved for Oscar Leung and Matt Yeung(though his chances are very slim) even though I feel Him Law has the highest chance. I feel Him Law has charm but comparing acting skills Oscar and Matt are miles more versatile and skilled than Him!
ReplyDelete@sport3888: Haha...same here! Except the only award I care about is Best Supporting Actor (since that's pretty much the only category I 'care' about every year because of the strong contenders each year)....though I also do support Oscar Leung, but not sure about his chances of getting Most Improved so not really going to care about that category unless he gets the award. Whatever happens with the rest of the awards, I really could care less, since the anniversary awards lost their 'prestige' a long time ago (maybe that's why they had to resort to the 'gimmick' this year of having audiences vote...)
Delete